ads2

Tuesday, 8 June 2021

Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS , Analysis in religious political perspective part 2

            Whether it is a matter of interpretation of religion with regard to minorities, the issue of moon sighting, blasphemy in other states, blasphemy of the Prophet and blasphemy of the Companions, in all such matters these ulema of Pakistan considered their role as "religion of duty". Paid and kept ordinary people confused. Playing the game of jihad and bloodshed in other countries, whether it is Kashmir or Palestine, why jihad is obligatory here, how jihad should be done and when jihad should be done, what kind of religious and political pressure the state has for it. All such ideologies have been sold and ideology has been created in the light of hadiths.

            The concept of Ummah, no matter how different the world may be in Muslim states, our scholars have been interpreting such issues differently. Undoubtedly, such ideologies are driven by their desire for political dominance and power. Such interpretations have been prone to various forms of violence and so-called jihad. This view of Pakistanis has long been challenged internationally, but with the exception of a few here, the majority of scholars have reinforced a narrow-minded, violent and explosive and jihadi religious view.

            The serious political challenge that religious scholars will face here is not in a position to challenge the linguistic superiority of the Arabs. These political and religious parties themselves are not in a position to have any political differences with Saudi Arabia. If they stir up such differences, the matter seems to be moving towards the whole of Islam, the Qur'an and then the sanctity of the sanctuaries. Therefore, even if there are hidden differences, the tone of all such differences will be flattery.

For all Muslims, whether Rohingya, Chechen or Bosnian, these ulema of Pakistan and the religious groups of these ulema have raised their voices, not under the Universal Humanitarian Charter, but with specific religious interpretations and "the spirit of the Muslim Ummah." What is more obvious in this regard is that the role of the political and religious parties of these ulema is to seize power by force rather than to serve religion and to subjugate other nations by terrorizing them with the power of the "atom bomb". Has been The role of all political and religious parties in this regard is also very hypocritical. His policy on atrocities against Muslims in China is to "keep quiet" and to blackmail the whole state about France, show off power and set fire to his own country.

            Now let's talk a little bit about Iran. Although the attack on the hadiths does not appear to have hurt Shia religious thought much, it has challenged local Islamic thinkers within Iran itself due to its weak economic, political and social structure. In any case, it will have an impact on Iran.

             In the next few years, there will be serious questions about Islamic jurisprudence and the principles of Sharia and Sharia law in Pakistan. Traditional interpretations now face a serious challenge.

                As far as Western countries are concerned, they will also give Pakistan a tough time in events like France. In the context of human rights, these countries will question Pakistan's views on "religious sympathy", "religious sentiments" and "love of the Prophet". Things seem to be moving towards their negation even though they don't want to. The sooner Pakistan finds an emotional and logical conclusion to this situation, the better. "

Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS , Analysis in religious political perspective part 1

        The modern mentality is so powerful that under its mere influence, the head of the "source of Islam" country said that ninety percent of the shepherds are liars. The book that is going to be numbered in the future, and the way in which it will be confined to the Arab tribes of fourteen hundred years ago while explaining the importance of perspective, will be seen by future generations if we do not see it. Lies have to be erased in the end. But when lies reign for fourteen hundred years, they cause irreparable damage to mankind.

"Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS and religious political perspective:

        Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said that 90% of the hadiths are weak and contradict the Qur'an and therefore are not binding. Only the Qur'an is worthy of obedience. It is as if his statement has challenged not only the Islamic status of some sects of religion and especially the Ahlul-Hadeeth, but also all the Pakistanis who considered the Ahadith as part of religion and faith. In the light of such hadiths, this class did not indulge in any form of bullying in the legislation, curriculum and politics in the country, now its religious status is also going to be challenged. 

        Now their religious position seems to be in dire straits. The same problem is called "don't go away, don't go away". For the past three or four decades, however, Pakistani devotees have considered themselves uninvited and self-proclaimed Allama and Mashaikh. All these sects have succeeded in making laws such as "blasphemy of the companions, blasphemy of the religion and blasphemy of the Prophet" in the light of the hadiths. Even in family law, the "ulema and shaykhs" of the same sect made a great fuss. 

        Whether it is halal or the issue of marriage of a girl to a lesser Sunni, whether the marriage is permissible, whether it is permissible and invalid, etc., all these have been explained by these scholars and shaykhs in the light of the hadiths narrated. It seems that this statement of Prince Suleiman is in fact a challenge to the principles of law and jurisprudence and one of its authoritative sources. Now, if we look at the curriculum of these scholars and shaykhs, it becomes clear that they have obstructed science, technology, modern intellectual, philosophical and social sciences. 

        All such interpretations have been made by these so-called scholars in the light of hadiths. He called his religious politics "Yazidi law" and "enforcing God's law on earth and defending it." Wherever the mighty horse of technology and modernity has given him a leg up, wherever he has been compelled to declare the "haraam" and "permissible" things of science and technology lawful, he has narrated similar hadiths. He relied on it and came up with new interpretations. He never apologized to the public, either for making a mistake in the past or for misinterpreting existing interpretations or for the sake of expediency.

Monday, 7 June 2021

Hadith Rasool is not the source of religion, said , Prince of Saudia Muhammed Bin Salman

 Hadith Rasool is not the source of religion. 

Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman said           

Sunday, June 6, 2021

In an interview with Al Arabiya TV, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said that in order to legislate, we should focus on the Qur'an instead of hadith. Hadiths (instructions of Hazrat Muhammad Salim) cannot be used in legislation. He said that interpretation of Qur'an according to modern times is necessary.


 He said that the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is not the source of religion. Explaining his point, he said that news alone could not be made a 'source of law'.


He says that if there is a clear command from the Qur'an in a chapter or if the Sunnah is continuous, then it is fine, otherwise "matters will be settled through Ijtihad".


This statement of Prince Muhammad bin Salman is a clear deviation from Wahhabism which Saudi Arabia has been propagating till now. He said that now there would be no punishment for stoning, flogging and killing of apostates and homosexuality.


It should be noted that during the reign of Muhammad bin Salman or earlier rulers in Saudi Arabia, many intellectuals and writers were killed for criticizing the rulers and many have been languishing behind bars for many years.


After the interview of Muhammad bin Salman, Sheikh Al-Azhar wrote in support of him that jurisprudential views are not sacred and unchangeable at all, the sanctity of jurisprudential views creates intellectual stagnation. Ancient jurisprudential issues and fatwas were in fact attempts at ijtihad and renewal of jurists in a particular period. On April 27, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman gave a lengthy interview to the Saudi channel Al-Arabiya in which he detailed the Veteran 2030 framework for social and economic reform, which was launched in 2015.


In this interview, he talks about the implementation of a new modern Islamic law, as opposed to the ongoing Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia. He said that all Muslim jurists and intellectuals emphasize the need for ijtihad in the light of Qur'an and Sunnah. So I don't think I'm saying anything weird.


Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia began in the 18th century when the teachings of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab began to be used by the rulers and then spread throughout the world through petrodollars. Until a few years ago, no one in Saudi Arabia could have imagined such a thing.


This statement of Prince Salman will prove to be a turning point in Islamic history. And this one statement has strangled the Wahhabism of the whole world because the basis of Wahhabism is the Qur'an and Hadith. They do not follow the ijtihad of any imam. Hanafi which is based on the Ijtihad of Imam Abu Hanifa and his disciples. That is why the people of Al-Azhar University in Egypt have supported the statement of Prince Salman, which is a unique thing in itself. Because the Egyptian University of Al-Azhar and Saudi Arabia are like the Catholic and Orthodox Christians ... Understandably, the Wahhabis, Salafis around the world look to Mecca in matters of Islamic law, and the rest of the sects look to Al-Azhar University.


Prince Salman has said a very big thing. If a religious scholar had said such a thing in Pakistan, he might have been killed by now. He has not only explicitly denied the importance of the hadiths, but has also questioned the authenticity of Bukhari and Muslim.


This is the first step of reformation within Islam. Reformation in Christianity took place about four hundred years ago. Because the world of Islam is still two or three hundred years behind the West, so now it is the turn of Islam. But because the media is so fast now, the internet, social media, cable, etc., the process of change may be faster.

Get ready! Before Your Lord in this World and Hereafter ! Serve the Humanity

When death comes, know for sure that nothing will work,

It doesn't matter who leaves your world,

• And all the affairs of this world will continue,

Someone else will take over your responsibilities,

Your wealth will go to the heirs,

• And you have to account for that wealth,

The first thing that will leave you at death is the name,

• People will say where is the dead body?

• When they want to read the funeral, they will say bring the funeral,

• When they start burying, they will say, "Bring the corpse closer."

 Your name will never be mentioned,

 Don't be deceived by wealth, lineage, position and children.

 How low is this world, and how great is the way we are going,

There are three types of mourners:

(1). People who know you superficially will say, "Oh, poor thing!" May Allah have mercy on him.

(2). Your friends will grieve for a few hours or a few days and then they will return to their words and laughter.

(3). The grief of your family members will deepen, they will grieve for a few weeks, a few months or a year and then they will put you in a basket of memories,

Your story will end among the people and your true story will begin and that is the Hereafter.

• You will lose your:

(1). beauty,

(2). Wealth,

(3). Health,

(4). Children,

(5). You will be away from your houses and palaces,

(6). The husband will be separated from the wife and the wife from the husband.

• Only your process will be left with you.

 

* Here the question arises that what have you already prepared for your grave and the Hereafter?

This is a fact that needs to be considered, so pay attention to it:

(1). Duties,

(2). Nawafil,

(3). Hidden charity,

(4). Good deeds

(5). Tahajjud prayer

(6). And towards good morals,

• May be saved!

If the deceased is brought back to this world, he will prefer to give alms, as Allah says: O my Lord! Why didn't you give me respite for a short time so that I could give alms?

* He will not say that I should pray or I should fast or I should perform Hajj and Umrah.

* Scholars say that the deceased mentions charity only because he sees its great effects after his death, so give more and more charity.

 And the best thing you can do right now is taking ten seconds out of your time.

Please share this writing with others with the intention of goodwill and sincerity because saying good things is also charity.

 If you try to remind people through this writing, you will find it in your scales on the Day of Resurrection and give advice, because advice certainly benefits the believers.

It is often said that women, maidens and "sex" are always on the minds of clerics

If this is true, then who is more visible in coastal and recreational places around the world, the mullahs or the liberals? 

And just tell me who is demanding that women should not be lured to the services of strangers, dressed in shorts and dressed to please men in plane and bus passengers, hotels, offices and clubs and Artificial laughter should not be forced to laugh?

When the Maulvi makes such a demand, the liberals are the ones who get the most fire, then they jump into the arena with beautiful slogans of "women's rights" and "women's liberation".

 

That is why, whether it is coastal entertainment venues around the world or big five star hotels, clubs and massage centers, you will see women everywhere and that too to please the liberals and not to please the clerics.

These liberals also want a woman who is of the desired standard of color and age, otherwise wouldn't a black-aged woman be a woman because in many professions you have no room for her.

 

That is why I say that liberals are in fact carnivores, not women's rights activists. If these people are not "carnivores" and "carnivores", then why aren't a fifty or sixty year old woman considered as heroin in the movies, why are air hostesses subject to age and body attractiveness?

 

Hey friend! Here, the eyes, the cheeks, the lips, the teeth, the hair, the skin, the waist area and the features of the body, everything is seen.

 

Introduce women to men all over the world as a desirable food, you value every single part of her body, you dance her for a few clicks in advertisements, her hands, feet, face, teeth, hair , Skin, even smiles, tears, laughter and voice you sell and the glorious clerics that "sex" rides on their minds !!

Saudi King Muhammed Bin Salman said that about the Hadiths & the Quran

            In a recent interview, Saudi King Mohammed bin Salman said that about 90% of the hadiths are false and fabricated, which cannot be based on Islamic Sharia law, and in this regard, he has returned to the Qur'an and the new era of the Qur'an and What is the intention of making new interpretations and interpretations according to the circumstances?

In a way, these are almost the same words that the Pakistani Islamic thinker Ghulam Ahmad Pervez and others said in their books some time ago and made clear indications that the greatest loss to Islam is the innumerable fabricated and false hadiths in the books of hadith. Has arrived from

Ghulam Ahmad Pervez's books were about to come to the fore when religious scholars from all over Pakistan mobilized and one Ghulam Ahmad Pervez was unanimously sentenced to disbelief by ten thousand religious scholars.

Numerous books were written against him by religious scholars. And there were speeches in mosques.

But now the voice of calling 90% of the hadiths false, fabricated and unreliable and banning them has come from the most important, powerful and credible center of the Islamic world, Saudi Arabia, from which not only Islam originated.

 In fact, all the holy places of the Muslims, including the Kaaba and the Masjid al-Nabawi, are in Saudi Arabia, and it is no ordinary Saudi who raises his voice, but the most powerful man in Saudi Arabia, the Saudi ruler.

 And also that the religious scholars sitting in the Al-Azhar Mosque in Egypt, one of the largest centers of learning in the Islamic world, immediately supported the Saudi prince's statement.

The Saudi monarch is aware that times have changed and that in today's modern world, which is on the shoulders of science and technology, it has not been possible to answer all the questions or claims raised in the hadiths. Or the things that stand in the way of making the Islamic world a part of the modern world.

In addition, countries like Saudi Arabia have their own internal and external interests that Saudi Arabia must pursue.

If implemented, it would be the biggest change and leap in Islamic history.

Now what is the reaction of religious scholars in Pakistan and other Islamic countries? And how does this camel have to sit? It remains to be seen ...

However, public criticism of the Saudi monarch has been met with support from a large number of Muslims.

In a way, we can say that the world of Islam is at the same crossroads today as Christianity faced in the changing world around it four hundred years ago.

A closer look at the situation and events reveals that a great change is unfolding around us. Whether the outcome of this struggle for change is positive or negative, it will become clear in the times to come.

Why is our family system shaking ?

In Europe, their wives are now getting rid of the unmarried life and they look at the married life of Muslim women with envious eyes. Similarly, we have a small number of women but some of them are running away from their married life.

We cannot justify it by calling it the result of sexual misconduct or feminist movements.

Because there are definitely undeniable reasons that make married life scary

Islam is the religion of nature and the religion of humanity. It has given Muslims a system of society in which the rights and duties of human life and individuals of all classes have been defined. Especially with regard to the rights and duties of husband and wife. The teachings are very clear. In Islam, the relationship between husband and wife regarding rights and duties and the basis of this relationship is very enduring.

In the first verses of Surah An-Nisa ', Allah (swt) describes the creative union of man and woman and says: I created you from a single soul.

This was a multiplication of class distinctions, ie men and women are creatively equal. You will see that the Qur'an gave human rights to women at a time when they were considered very low and inferior and there is no room for any doubt. 

They considered her to be a creature born of a lower substance and a man born of a higher element, some considered her only a luxury, as in present day Europe and some people even said that woman was born of filth and considered her creator, creator and Arab woman in ignorance. He was created in human form to serve a man and fulfill his sexual desires.

Islam equated woman with creation

 Then, granting equal rights, he obliged both of them to pay each other's dues

Yes, divide the responsibilities

But unfortunately the rules and regulations that we have are not Islamic at all. They are a replica of the national, regional or Hindu customs that we are hiding in the guise of Islam.

The first difference begins at birth

When a boy is born, his face becomes bright. When a girl is born, her face withers, then there is a difference in education and training.

The child will become a doctor, engineer, scientist, but the girl is made benevolent only by giving her proper education

Then their legitimate and prescribed inheritance is robbed

In the case of the same marriage

The boy's likes and dislikes are taken care of but in most rural areas the girl is not allowed to like or dislike

Where parents look for a male for a girl, not a male

Although marriage is not just a name for sexual gratification but a multi-purpose agreement, it is a bond of generations.

That is why Shari'a established a permanent chapter on the mutual rights of couples

So that both of them can make their married life happy and get the real fruits of it. But unfortunately in our country, married life is started without knowing the principles of Shariah. As a result, in the last two or three decades, in our society, apart from the incidents of brutal dowry and burning alive, divorce and khula I am gradually increasing and generations are being destroyed. 

Therefore, before establishing a marital life, it is important to seek guidance from these teachings so that the purpose of marriage and its fruits can be achieved properly.

Essay: Importance of English Language

English language is considered as the most popular language in the world. It is spoken by billions of people from different countries and cu...