Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS , Analysis in religious political perspective part 1

        The modern mentality is so powerful that under its mere influence, the head of the "source of Islam" country said that ninety percent of the shepherds are liars. The book that is going to be numbered in the future, and the way in which it will be confined to the Arab tribes of fourteen hundred years ago while explaining the importance of perspective, will be seen by future generations if we do not see it. Lies have to be erased in the end. But when lies reign for fourteen hundred years, they cause irreparable damage to mankind.

"Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS and religious political perspective:

        Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said that 90% of the hadiths are weak and contradict the Qur'an and therefore are not binding. Only the Qur'an is worthy of obedience. It is as if his statement has challenged not only the Islamic status of some sects of religion and especially the Ahlul-Hadeeth, but also all the Pakistanis who considered the Ahadith as part of religion and faith. In the light of such hadiths, this class did not indulge in any form of bullying in the legislation, curriculum and politics in the country, now its religious status is also going to be challenged. 

        Now their religious position seems to be in dire straits. The same problem is called "don't go away, don't go away". For the past three or four decades, however, Pakistani devotees have considered themselves uninvited and self-proclaimed Allama and Mashaikh. All these sects have succeeded in making laws such as "blasphemy of the companions, blasphemy of the religion and blasphemy of the Prophet" in the light of the hadiths. Even in family law, the "ulema and shaykhs" of the same sect made a great fuss. 

        Whether it is halal or the issue of marriage of a girl to a lesser Sunni, whether the marriage is permissible, whether it is permissible and invalid, etc., all these have been explained by these scholars and shaykhs in the light of the hadiths narrated. It seems that this statement of Prince Suleiman is in fact a challenge to the principles of law and jurisprudence and one of its authoritative sources. Now, if we look at the curriculum of these scholars and shaykhs, it becomes clear that they have obstructed science, technology, modern intellectual, philosophical and social sciences. 

        All such interpretations have been made by these so-called scholars in the light of hadiths. He called his religious politics "Yazidi law" and "enforcing God's law on earth and defending it." Wherever the mighty horse of technology and modernity has given him a leg up, wherever he has been compelled to declare the "haraam" and "permissible" things of science and technology lawful, he has narrated similar hadiths. He relied on it and came up with new interpretations. He never apologized to the public, either for making a mistake in the past or for misinterpreting existing interpretations or for the sake of expediency.