For almost the last two centuries, the narrative of the naturalness of the universe has given the narrative of the theistic gods (punishment and retribution) the hardest time in the field of science, which has boiled over and influenced the rest of society. ۔ No other thought (Hindu Pan-Theist or Chinese philosophy) has had such an impact on the Abrahamic world.
The universe can naturally come into being without the intervention of a theosophical God. This narrative has undermined the whole moral narrative of life connected with truth and falsehood. There is no one to listen to you in the dark and blind universe. This has caused psychological distress to many people. Man has to shoulder the responsibility of the world around him, this statement seems to be a source of concern for many people. In the struggle of life, the lost and crushed bodies are thus annihilated and forgotten. And the cold seal of the universe makes him even more anxious. If God, the mother of security, is the cause of peace, then there is no doubt that such ideas are connected with the psyche. The Creator of such a large universe is dying and resurrecting in the form of Jesus, so to speak of Messiahs ... etc. Why does the human intellect slip and psychological and emotional conversations begin. The main reason and the part connected with morality is that the end of the story of the human body is not emotionally acceptable to us. We do not digest this resolution of life attached to the human individual. The reasons for this are also related to our social brain and its ancient evolution.
The natural narrative beyond truth and falsehood has proved to be a very important stage of human social evolutionary thinking, which is perhaps the first time that man has been removed from any emotional attachment in an attempt to move towards rationality and experience.
Even natural narratives bound by truth and falsehood are considered evil deeds (sophisticated religious scholars hide or play down that matter). But natural narrators also reject both by associating falsehood with God. This is also proving to be very difficult for religious narrators. When moral philosophers like Peter Singer say that any animal that feels pain is more important than the human fetus (in the realm of pain and happiness) that does not feel pain, the mouths of religious thought will be wide open. And think of it (privately) as evil thinking.
The point of all this is that when Nietzsche said that God (Theist) was dead, it meant that he was watching the building of punishment fall in his time. Naturalism is in the process of erecting a new edifice in its place, which not only describes the process of creation of the universe, but also the moral issues related to life. The real challenge of building a world built around religions is how to shake the foundations of the building of naturalism that stands in their way. This is only possible at the academic level and the bulldozer is still with the other team. He has demolished many religious buildings in the society
