The great twentieth-century French philosopher Jacques Derrida said in a lecture on Christianity that it has so much flexibility, so much potential for breadth of familiarity, so much tendency to self-destruct what form it will take in the future. It is impossible to predict.
This conclusion of Derrida is so profound that it is not an easy task to understand.
What matters most is that when the religion of Christianity takes on such a form that it seems to the superficial mind that it is not Christianity but something else, then in Derrida's view it is nothing else, but There will be extended Christianity.
It seems to me that the idea is based on Derrida's conclusion that "there is nothing beyond the text."
As a result, the greatest danger is to those ideologues who, on the basis of their identities based on color, race, nation, religion, language and region, finalize their politics.
When the modern philosophy of centralization and origin has become the postmodernism, then politics in the name of color, race, nation, region, religion, etc. is mere politics, not a real philosophy of clinging to any truth, but a delusion. Is tantamount to understanding reality.
