Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS , Analysis in religious political perspective part 2

            Whether it is a matter of interpretation of religion with regard to minorities, the issue of moon sighting, blasphemy in other states, blasphemy of the Prophet and blasphemy of the Companions, in all such matters these ulema of Pakistan considered their role as "religion of duty". Paid and kept ordinary people confused. Playing the game of jihad and bloodshed in other countries, whether it is Kashmir or Palestine, why jihad is obligatory here, how jihad should be done and when jihad should be done, what kind of religious and political pressure the state has for it. All such ideologies have been sold and ideology has been created in the light of hadiths.

            The concept of Ummah, no matter how different the world may be in Muslim states, our scholars have been interpreting such issues differently. Undoubtedly, such ideologies are driven by their desire for political dominance and power. Such interpretations have been prone to various forms of violence and so-called jihad. This view of Pakistanis has long been challenged internationally, but with the exception of a few here, the majority of scholars have reinforced a narrow-minded, violent and explosive and jihadi religious view.

            The serious political challenge that religious scholars will face here is not in a position to challenge the linguistic superiority of the Arabs. These political and religious parties themselves are not in a position to have any political differences with Saudi Arabia. If they stir up such differences, the matter seems to be moving towards the whole of Islam, the Qur'an and then the sanctity of the sanctuaries. Therefore, even if there are hidden differences, the tone of all such differences will be flattery.

For all Muslims, whether Rohingya, Chechen or Bosnian, these ulema of Pakistan and the religious groups of these ulema have raised their voices, not under the Universal Humanitarian Charter, but with specific religious interpretations and "the spirit of the Muslim Ummah." What is more obvious in this regard is that the role of the political and religious parties of these ulema is to seize power by force rather than to serve religion and to subjugate other nations by terrorizing them with the power of the "atom bomb". Has been The role of all political and religious parties in this regard is also very hypocritical. His policy on atrocities against Muslims in China is to "keep quiet" and to blackmail the whole state about France, show off power and set fire to his own country.

            Now let's talk a little bit about Iran. Although the attack on the hadiths does not appear to have hurt Shia religious thought much, it has challenged local Islamic thinkers within Iran itself due to its weak economic, political and social structure. In any case, it will have an impact on Iran.

             In the next few years, there will be serious questions about Islamic jurisprudence and the principles of Sharia and Sharia law in Pakistan. Traditional interpretations now face a serious challenge.

                As far as Western countries are concerned, they will also give Pakistan a tough time in events like France. In the context of human rights, these countries will question Pakistan's views on "religious sympathy", "religious sentiments" and "love of the Prophet". Things seem to be moving towards their negation even though they don't want to. The sooner Pakistan finds an emotional and logical conclusion to this situation, the better. "