Heart Touching post PART 3 (LAST) LIFE’s TALE

Dignity came yesterday ... He lives in Wilayat (Abroad).

When I came back, I went to meet him ... He has become a great officer by reading and writing.

 I have come to pick you up sir ...

He said, "I have prepared all your papers, made a passport and come to pick you up."

 

And here he wants to open an anchor in the name of my mother.

 

Sir, I was surprised and asked Waqar ...

Dude, people build schools, they build hospitals, so why does he want to open the anchor and that too in the name of his mother ...?

 

Began to say ... Hunger is a very cruel thing, a thief makes a robber ... there is no study on an empty stomach ... A life comes out of a crooked tree ...

Who knows this better than you ... Like all fakes, eyes are not readable ... Nor those who have illusions like you ...

Then he said ... Dude, let me tell you something today ... I know everything ... A few days later, when the will of the pratha had increased and the butter too ...

My stomach used to get full after eating half a pratha ...

Aman didn't approve of either of us being hungry.

Waqar was crying profusely ...

Aman, it has spread here too, sir.

 

And then I got lost in the thought that

The friendship between Lusti Andre and Pratha was more mature or ...

Fake and dignified ...

Relationships based on illusions never break ...

While its better for the prosperity and good works

Fika was saying, I still remember that thing of my mother, sir ... he said...

Motherhood is not divided ... What if the mothers are separated?

 It is the illusion that maintains relationships and friendships.

End

Heart Touching post PART 2 LIFE’s TALE

As soon as he went to the first burki (nawala) tidh (stomach), the tormented intestines of dignity sent thanks through their eyes.

I secretly stopped my hand and kept Waqar in my words ...

He ate the whole pratha ... And fur often started to happen ... I would mix dignity with food under some pretext ...

My pratha became a close friend with the hunger for dignity ... And with my dignity ...

Whose friend was more mature ...?

 As soon as I came home from school, I would feel hungry ... 

One day my mother asked ... Son, if I make pratha with you, he will eat it or not ... 

Why are you so hungry ...? 

My hands and feet become swollen, and as soon as I come, I feel hungry. 

Like being hungry for centuries ...

Where was I going to tell you something sir ... 

But the mother breathed her last ... 

When she heard the whole story, she was shocked and said ... I will make two parathas from tomorrow ...

 I said, "If Aman Pratha is given, the illusion of dignity will be shattered." I just come home and eat ... 

From that day onwards, my mother increased the price of pratha and also the amount of butter.

She said that she is also the father of a mother like me ...

Mamta is not scattered.

What if the mothers are separated ...?

 

I thought ... Fake, who was studying in the fifth grade, knew how to keep confusion.

The illusion of caste ... Once the illusion is broken, the servant is also broken ... He spends his whole life collecting his own debris. 

And the servant never connects again ... Fakey used to be confused from the fifth grade onwards.

He could not read beyond that ... And I, who was Sahib Ji for Fake, was an educated, highly educated ... No school taught me to be confused ...

 

Sahib ji then started going to Waqar's house with excuses. "Look, Nooran has made greens, taste it and tell me how it is made" Waqar's mother didn't even know and one of her dings would tip ...

Sahib Ji was very fond of reading Waqar. 

Then Aman told Mama to put Aunty Nooran to work in someone's house in the city. Salary, dignity, education and two-time bread were fixed ...

 I stayed in touch with Aunty Nooran till my mother's life. Aunty also passed away a few months after Aman's departure. 

After that the connection was cut off ...

Heart Touching post PART 1 LIFE’s TALE

Yesterday a new shiny car was parked in front of Fake Potter's house.

It was talked about all over the village.

Who came to meet ...

I knew Fika would come at the first opportunity and tell me the whole story ...

The same thing happened in the evening when he came and sat on the floor. After asking about the current situation, he started saying ... 

Sir, it is a matter of many years ago. 

Do you remember Aunty Nooran who used to roast grains in the kiln? 

Who had one son Waqar ...

 I said yes man how can I forget the people of my village ...

May God bless you Sahib Ji, Waqar and I used to study in the fifth grade.

At school, there was often a tree in the grass of dignity ...

Sahib Ji used to cry in a corner ...

Master G used to scold him and send him home to show him to Hakim and take medicine.

One day I was sitting near Waqar during half holiday. I opened my mother's hand-made pratha and pickle ...

Sir, when I feel very hungry, isn't it? So, first of all, I remember the pratha made by my mother ... and the fragrance of that pratha disappears in the whole pind.

Find out what magic was in the hands of Sahib Ji Aman ...

Sahib Ji Waqar looked at Pratha and looked away ... 

That one glance revealed all the secrets of his tree ... For the first time in my life, I saw the intestines burning in someone's eyes with hunger. 

Lusty Andrein from the famines of Sahib Ji Waqar ... Hands were sitting in front of the tears as if to say ... 

If even one Athro falls, the illusion will be broken ...

Even before the illusion of dignity was broken,

 I prayed for him and joined him in the meal.

A look at Aristotle's "Jewel"

There are three types of gems in Aristotle's philosophy, two of which are sensory and one non-sensory. That is, two are physical and one is metaphysical. The two senses are a plant, a tree, etc., which are destroyed. 

The second belongs to the human senses, the physical world. Aristotle described them as universes, such as the sun, moon or other planets, etc. 

These are sensations but they cannot be destroyed. But that which is immovable is confirmed by the supernatural, the supernatural, that is, the "mere intellect", which he calls the "first principle" or the "immovable stimulus." 

When it has nothing to do with the senses, it is, according to Aristotle, a purely rational function and formation, and the intellect has the capacity to reflect on its own thought process. 

In the words of Aristotle, "thought or reason thinks on its own." And so she perceives this immobile essence, which is transcendental.

This post is for consideration only. We will now go on to discuss Aristotle's two main concepts, probability and reality. These are the words in English. 

Potentiality and Acctuality.

One thing to keep in mind here is that those friends who consider the intellect as an unknown reflection of the "external world" are not aware of the power of "logic". Logic is purely the science of thought, and no one understood it better than Aristotle, because it was Aristotle who laid the foundations of logic, and it was this logic that ruled the world of thought for two thousand years. 

Therefore, the difference between inductive (experiential, sensory) and derivative (non-sensory, rational) should be kept in mind, in which case it will be possible to understand the real and immense power of the intellect.

Aristotle's words about what I even have explained are as follows:

Since there have been three sorts of substances, two of them physical and one unmovable, regarding the latter we must assert that it's necessary that there should be endless unmovable substance. For substances are the primary of existing things, and if they're all destructible, all things are destructible.

Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book 9, Sec, 6

The intellect isn't just the camera. The intellect processes conceptual laws or structures by processing some logical principles. during this way you'll compare the intellect ( brain process) with the digital process. AI in computers is predicated on logical algorithms.

If the intellect isn't a mirrored image of the external world, then what's it that man acquires from his material world? All materialism is predicated thereon . The intellect is evolutionary in nature, but during this evolutionary process going beyond physics is additionally one among the essential characteristics of the intellect.

Dude, that's impossible . If you transcend medicine, then it isn't possible to elucidate things completely, especially things that are not beyond medicine. I even have said that Kant wrote the primary critique and Hegel wrote it in logic and therefore the history of philosophy confirms this. Aristotle also considered the intellect to be superior to the soul, on the grounds that the intellect itself can reflect on its own function, without the help of the senses.

Aristotle's philosophy draws these three conclusions

Ghazali, "Tahafat al-Falasfa" and Takfir of philosophers

The study of Ghazali's book "Tahafat-ul-Falasfa" was completed. The conclusions I had drawn from reading it in 2006, and the impressions that were on my mind, this time I have rejected most of them myself. The book contains high level logical discussions. Ghazali sums up the conclusions of the philosophers Ibn Sina and al-Farabi that "logic must be strong." And then Ghazali agrees with Ibn Sina and al-Farabi and writes that "this is correct." Ghazali goes on to say that it is incumbent upon us to "follow in their footsteps word for word, and to debate with them in this book in their language, that is, in the logic which is their interpretation." Philosopher, pages 96-97).

Therefore, it should be noted that Ghazali did not contradict the interpretations of Ibn Sina and Farabi by applying any "religious or inspired" formula, but used logic for this. Religion, which is itself a collection of contradictions, is incapable of talking about philosophy and logic, because it has to be philosophical and logical. In the history of philosophy, the rejection of a philosophy using philosophical and logical arguments is a general attitude, not surprising. Ghazali's failure, however, is that he was able to expose some of the contradictions but could not dissolve them, as Fakhta used the canteen method to analyze the contradictions in Kant's philosophy.

I will write on this subject in some detail, but for the time being I have to briefly discuss the fatwa which Ghazali issued on the last page of Tahafat al-Falasafah and applied it to the three conclusions of Ibn Sina and Farabi. Is.

1. Ibn Sina and Farabi accepted the conclusion of Aristotle's philosophy that the universe is ancient, it has no beginning in time.

2: Ibn Sina also quoted Aristotle's conclusion that God knows only the Universal, he is free from the knowledge of the Particular.

3: Ibn Sina and al-Farabi also concluded that souls cannot occur in these bodies after death, but that the survival of the soul is impossible.

Ghazali says that "this belief of the philosophers is blatant blasphemy" (Tahafat, p. 539). Ghazali has called these three conclusions of Ibn Sina and Farabi 'takfiri' and 'apostasy' and has made it obligatory to kill anyone who expresses or propagates these views. That is, this fatwa of Ghazali was against Ibn Sina and Farabi. According to this fatwa, both are obligatory to be killed. Ghazali's reason is that it threatens to mislead ordinary Muslims.

It should be noted that Ghazali has discussed a total of twenty points in Tahafat al-Falasfa. Ghazali's words about them are as follows: "Except for the three that we have quoted from the philosophers, all of them have been said by some sect of Muslims." (Tahafat, 539) ۔

Regarding the three points we have mentioned above, Ghazali's objection to philosophers is that they could not prove their non-existence. But keep in mind that Ghazali himself could not prove his 'existence'. The only point is that these points give rise to the idea that the prophets are liars. So these results are not correct. Ghazali's words are: "These three issues are in no way compatible with Islam. His followers consider the Prophets to be liars." (Tahafat, p. 538).

The thoughtful expression of Abu Bakr Razi & Good and evil social evolution

The field of medicine dominated Europe until the seventeenth century. Some Western thinkers have even put it above Ibn Sina. Regrettably, Razi's philosophical views were buried in the religious world.

I had posted some time ago that if the concepts of good and evil have been placed in man and the intellect is active, then there is no need for revelation, this was my own thinking.

I did not know much about Abu Bakr Razi's intellectual affairs, but I was surprised to see his philosophical views. Razi says that if the concepts of good and evil have been inculcated and the intellect has the identity of good and evil, then there is no need for "prophecy".

I have read ten articles on Razi in the last eight days, and it is worth noting that in the 21st century, there has been a proliferation of books on Abu Bakr Razi. Read for yourself and draw conclusions.

Good and evil are the result of social evolution. Nothing is predetermined here. For example, in the time of Abraham, human beings used to sacrifice human beings. That is why if you chose to sacrifice one of your sons, the social norms of the time did not object. This process continued till the time of Hazrat Omar who stopped the last sacrifice which was in the form of a virgin and was offered on the river Nile! Revelation did not descend on Hazrat Omar. But by that time social evolution had reached such a stage that the intellect had begun to go through such nonsense! The prohibition of alcohol in the Qur'an itself came later and the advice of Hazrat Omar was banned first. I can also give thousands of examples of good and evil for which I have to write a separate office. You see, due to social evolution and the height of consciousness, countless theological precepts have become almost obsolete. It is becoming difficult to implement the commandments and prohibitions in the Islamic countries themselves!

Drop scene of gang rape and theft with Shujaabad bride.

But the question here is that if we cannot call the action of one woman the action of all women, then how can we attribute the abuse committed by one man to all men ???

Four or five days ago, a news spread like wildfire and reached me that at three o'clock in the night, the robbers entered the wedding house in the guise of policemen and took the family members hostage for an hour. The bride was also beating her husband. In addition, 5 tons of gold was looted and fled. As soon as I saw this news on the website of a national TV channel, I rebuked it. It was indeed a tragic incident which reminded me of the motorway tragedy some time ago.

I started criticizing the government and the concerned police for how long such incidents will continue.

How long will the dignity of women in Pakistan be returned like this?

The other day my team informed me that you were very upset and emotional about this matter and see what is the real truth of this incident.

Now look at the other side of the picture.

The bride herself had called her acquaintance home ... The medical report proved that only one accused had been abused. Police traced the accused through the bride's mobile data and conducted raids for arrest.

When the other side of the concept was shown to me, I couldn't believe it. I told them to wait longer and forbade them to break the news. But unfortunately this is true and this incident was a planned incident. Eventually it was revealed that no one else in the guise of robbers was the bride's own called lover. The accused is a young man of Chauhan family and a resident of Galewal area of ​​Lodhran. The bride has to look her best during this time, because of posterity more than anything else. And the honor of the two families was tarnished. This woman had descended as a torment on the noble men of the world and at the same time she had tried to defame the police uniform.

In our society, a woman is considered oppressed and weak, but sometimes a woman does what no one can think of. In front of the person with whom she got married, she fulfilled the physical desire of the acquaintance and made up the story that The gang-rape report with me proved that only one person was raped, not the woman herself.

This woman did not even think of honoring her parents. She also buried the honor of those who married her and brought her home. What would have happened to the bridegroom who was disgraced on the first night? I wish the truth of this incident would not come to light. I wish people would think that the robbers had committed mass rape during the robbery.

The whole story came out from the girl's mobile. I often say don't just call women oppressed. The reality is very bitter. Men are more oppressed than women in this society.

She wronged her brothers, she wronged her father, she wronged her relatives, and when she did not find peace, she wronged the family in which she married, and the husband with whom she married a woman. How many men were buried in honor?