A look at Aristotle's "Jewel"

There are three types of gems in Aristotle's philosophy, two of which are sensory and one non-sensory. That is, two are physical and one is metaphysical. The two senses are a plant, a tree, etc., which are destroyed. 

The second belongs to the human senses, the physical world. Aristotle described them as universes, such as the sun, moon or other planets, etc. 

These are sensations but they cannot be destroyed. But that which is immovable is confirmed by the supernatural, the supernatural, that is, the "mere intellect", which he calls the "first principle" or the "immovable stimulus." 

When it has nothing to do with the senses, it is, according to Aristotle, a purely rational function and formation, and the intellect has the capacity to reflect on its own thought process. 

In the words of Aristotle, "thought or reason thinks on its own." And so she perceives this immobile essence, which is transcendental.

This post is for consideration only. We will now go on to discuss Aristotle's two main concepts, probability and reality. These are the words in English. 

Potentiality and Acctuality.

One thing to keep in mind here is that those friends who consider the intellect as an unknown reflection of the "external world" are not aware of the power of "logic". Logic is purely the science of thought, and no one understood it better than Aristotle, because it was Aristotle who laid the foundations of logic, and it was this logic that ruled the world of thought for two thousand years. 

Therefore, the difference between inductive (experiential, sensory) and derivative (non-sensory, rational) should be kept in mind, in which case it will be possible to understand the real and immense power of the intellect.

Aristotle's words about what I even have explained are as follows:

Since there have been three sorts of substances, two of them physical and one unmovable, regarding the latter we must assert that it's necessary that there should be endless unmovable substance. For substances are the primary of existing things, and if they're all destructible, all things are destructible.

Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book 9, Sec, 6

The intellect isn't just the camera. The intellect processes conceptual laws or structures by processing some logical principles. during this way you'll compare the intellect ( brain process) with the digital process. AI in computers is predicated on logical algorithms.

If the intellect isn't a mirrored image of the external world, then what's it that man acquires from his material world? All materialism is predicated thereon . The intellect is evolutionary in nature, but during this evolutionary process going beyond physics is additionally one among the essential characteristics of the intellect.

Dude, that's impossible . If you transcend medicine, then it isn't possible to elucidate things completely, especially things that are not beyond medicine. I even have said that Kant wrote the primary critique and Hegel wrote it in logic and therefore the history of philosophy confirms this. Aristotle also considered the intellect to be superior to the soul, on the grounds that the intellect itself can reflect on its own function, without the help of the senses.