OSHO , the twisting mind map

In Japan, a king went to see a poor man.

   He must have thought that the Sufi must have been meditating, praying, worshiping, and reciting lessons, praising God. He had heard her compliment, so he went to see her. There was a big garden outside the poor man's hut and a man was digging a pit. The king asked, "I have come to see such and such a poor man. Where is he?"

   Beggar said: It is possible to meet this Beggar here and now, but you will have some difficulty, you will not understand, so you sit inside, I will call this Beggar.

   The king went in and sat down and after a while the same man who was digging a pit from outside came from behind and said: Please, I am that poor man. And he was dressed as a monk.

   The king said: Surprisingly. Are you digging a pit?

   He said: I was digging a pit. And even then it was religious, but your eyes could hardly see it, because your eyes would get used to seeing clothes.

   I was digging a pit, but my mind was one with God. I was digging a pit, but I had no problem. I was digging a pit, but I was absorbed in digging a pit. He was digging a pit, but that was my meditation, that was my meditation. There was no thought in my mind, no alternative, just digging a pit. But you didn't see it, so I had to make excuses. I have come dressed, now I have become a Sannyasin.

   The king did not understand what nonsense this was. He looked around; there was no idol of God in this hut. He asked: How are you poor, there is no idol of God here!

   Beggar said: This room is very small, there is no room for two, and only one can stay here. Where is the space of two places! Now either I am left or God is left. So I thought it would be better to have mine. I am the living God. And why increase the crowd by bringing an idol, a dead god, here! And he said: When there are two, meeting with God ceases, and when there is only one, meeting with God ceases.

   If I live here alone, I stay in touch with God, and if someone else comes here, everything goes wrong. So I didn't bring God here to meet God.

   The king did not understand. The next day he sent this poor man as an offering to the idol of God.

   If an idol comes as a gift, what should the poor do with it? He hung it on a peg and wrote, 'My God, now you have come, then stay. By the way, I'm so busy with myself that I won't take much care of you, so I'm sorry and don't get angry. No worship or prayer will be possible here, because I am so lost in you that that is left to worry about this idol!

   A few days later the king returned. The sleeping dust has settled on the idol. He asked: What happened? Wasn't this idol clean? Didn't bother anyone? The dust has settled on it.

   The mystic laughed and said that if we had to worry about God, it would become a big ego. God is the one who cares for us.

   And the God on whom the dust flies, without worrying about us, knowing that he will not be God, we will have a toy. So I deliberately let the dust settle so that you can see exactly what God who can't even remove his own dust will do to our dust? What will the one who is incompetent do for us?

   Surely this is a god we have made, this is not a god. Whatever man makes cannot be God - whether he builds a temple or an idol. How can a man-made thing be God? How can a man-made thing be God? Nothing man-made can be God. There is no way to God.

   Man-made books, man-made temples, man-made mantras, man-made prayers, no one is able to take them to God. Because what man has made will be smaller than man. Man cannot create anything greater than himself.

   Osho, twisting his mind, Rev. 6

A public service message in Pakistan

On 11th June 2021 Friday

Today the temperature in most parts of Pakistan ranged from 44 to 49 degrees Celsius. *

 * In the next few days, Equinox Equinox (the time when the sun intersects the equator and day and night are equal) will have a profound effect on the weather in Pakistan. Many areas will be affected. *

 * Please try to stay within your home, room or office as much as possible between 11pm and 4pm. *

 * The temperature will be around 44 degrees. *

 * This harsh weather will cause dehydration and fever. *

 * These effects are caused by the sun shining just above the equator. *

 * Please protect yourself and your loved ones from dehydration. *

 * Be sure to use at least 3 to 5 liters of water immediately. People with kidney disease should try to drink at least 6 to 8 liters of water per day. *

 * Keep an eye on blood pressure as much as possible. Anyone can get heatstroke. Take a bath with cold water. Stop or minimize the use of meat. Use more in eating fruits and vegetables. Never drink water after eating fruit. *

 * Heat wave is no joke. Keep an unused candle out of the room or in the open, it is a serious situation if the candle melts. *

 * Bedroom and other rooms can be kept humid by placing 2 open tubs or pots filled with water half over. *

 * Try to keep your lips and eyes moist. And share this message as much as possible in the public interest. *

 * This message was issued by the first aid program Anjuman-e-Hilal-e-Pakistan for the public interest.

 * Good luck and security to you. *

FOREX profit and loss percentage

 FOREX

 profit and loss percentage ..

 Forex is more complicated and risky ....

 Why do 90% of people lose money in Forex?

 Although the value of the currency will either go up or down in this regard, the average profit and loss should be 50/50 ...?

 Both are true.

 Reasons for loss ..

 The first reason is margin, commission or spread.

 Whenever a trade is made, a certain amount of loss starts at the same time even if the market stays still.

 The second reason ..

 Overview and background ..

 It seems that the price will either go up or down but the market has unlimited patterns. Most of the time the price moves in a zig zag pattern ie first up then down then up.

 Or first down then up. Or twice up and once down ....

 In addition, once or twice a day the price moves in the same direction continuously, then the technical indicators, especially the reverse indicators, prove to be wrong.

 RSI

 stochastic oscillator

 parabolic SAR

 etc ..

 The third reason ..

 Human Psychology. ۔

 Loss starts immediately after trading. Loss creates fear. It is also impossible to wait. Sleep or risk can be taken or trade can be closed out of fear. In case of closure, there will be less loss. In case of risk or profit. In either case, the human mind is not satisfied. Either fear will grow or greed and both are negative attitudes.

 Which later results in a deficit.

 The fourth reason ..

 Shopping for less money

 This facility is provided by every broker which has both advantages and disadvantages.

 This is called leverage

 It is a prudent way to make small trades even if the account is large despite the leverage, but it will reduce the amount of profit.

 The advantage is that you can wait as long as possible. This is a strategy on which some reports work. The first trade is done in one direction. When the loss starts, then the second trade is done by increasing the volume and so on. Until there is no profit, there should be maximum amount in the account, otherwise the account will be zero. If the market crashes, then the account must be very large, otherwise the account wash according to the stop loss principle.

 The last reason ...

 It is unlikely that any of your trades will make a profit.

 Every indicator has a loss in every strategy. It is not possible to estimate 100% accurately because the overall market is random because of the total investment that people all over the world make. The heavier the scale, the more the market goes. Yes, if you are able to trade trillions of dollars at a time, then you can move the currency up or down at will.

 Note ..

 There are also frauds in the name of this platform and there are dozens of types of it so doing business here without any research and without knowing it can harm you.

Man , Woman and our Society - Pakistan

 Men and women and our social system ...

 When more than one person started living in one place then problems started to arise because all the people had different thoughts, desires and preferences. Which societies or laws were made to solve. .

 Perfect society has not been formed till date. The positive and negative aspects of every system are everywhere.

 So there are those who like and dislike every system. There is no system that is 100% beneficial, be it socialism or ownership.

 Our current system also has many positive and negative aspects in which humanity or human beings are being exploited.

 On the one hand there is the system, on the other hand there is injustice, on the third hand there are natural requirements, fourthly our desires and ideas.

 If I ask, is injustice or oppression happening to men or women in our society?

 What will be the answer then?

 My answer would be both.

 If the question is who is more important?

 Even then the answer will remain the same.

 If we think deeply, then terms like good and evil, or guilt, disappear.

 Ask yourself a question. Do you know that doing such and such a thing is a crime and also a punishment? Will you still take the law into your own hands or not?

 The second question is whether you have ever done anything illegal, immoral or inhumane.

 We have to take stock of ourselves first, then we have to change our way of thinking and looking, otherwise we will never know the real causes of any problem ...

Solar Eclipse 10 June, 2021

*solar eclipse*

  * Tomorrow, Thursday, June 10, 2021 * 

solar eclipse will take place, * * 

Exclusive instructions issued by the Department of Astronomy for children. *

  * The eclipse will begin at 1:12 p.m.,

 The eclipse will reach its peak at 3:42 p.m., and will conclude at 4:34 p.m. *

Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS , Analysis in religious political perspective part 2

            Whether it is a matter of interpretation of religion with regard to minorities, the issue of moon sighting, blasphemy in other states, blasphemy of the Prophet and blasphemy of the Companions, in all such matters these ulema of Pakistan considered their role as "religion of duty". Paid and kept ordinary people confused. Playing the game of jihad and bloodshed in other countries, whether it is Kashmir or Palestine, why jihad is obligatory here, how jihad should be done and when jihad should be done, what kind of religious and political pressure the state has for it. All such ideologies have been sold and ideology has been created in the light of hadiths.

            The concept of Ummah, no matter how different the world may be in Muslim states, our scholars have been interpreting such issues differently. Undoubtedly, such ideologies are driven by their desire for political dominance and power. Such interpretations have been prone to various forms of violence and so-called jihad. This view of Pakistanis has long been challenged internationally, but with the exception of a few here, the majority of scholars have reinforced a narrow-minded, violent and explosive and jihadi religious view.

            The serious political challenge that religious scholars will face here is not in a position to challenge the linguistic superiority of the Arabs. These political and religious parties themselves are not in a position to have any political differences with Saudi Arabia. If they stir up such differences, the matter seems to be moving towards the whole of Islam, the Qur'an and then the sanctity of the sanctuaries. Therefore, even if there are hidden differences, the tone of all such differences will be flattery.

For all Muslims, whether Rohingya, Chechen or Bosnian, these ulema of Pakistan and the religious groups of these ulema have raised their voices, not under the Universal Humanitarian Charter, but with specific religious interpretations and "the spirit of the Muslim Ummah." What is more obvious in this regard is that the role of the political and religious parties of these ulema is to seize power by force rather than to serve religion and to subjugate other nations by terrorizing them with the power of the "atom bomb". Has been The role of all political and religious parties in this regard is also very hypocritical. His policy on atrocities against Muslims in China is to "keep quiet" and to blackmail the whole state about France, show off power and set fire to his own country.

            Now let's talk a little bit about Iran. Although the attack on the hadiths does not appear to have hurt Shia religious thought much, it has challenged local Islamic thinkers within Iran itself due to its weak economic, political and social structure. In any case, it will have an impact on Iran.

             In the next few years, there will be serious questions about Islamic jurisprudence and the principles of Sharia and Sharia law in Pakistan. Traditional interpretations now face a serious challenge.

                As far as Western countries are concerned, they will also give Pakistan a tough time in events like France. In the context of human rights, these countries will question Pakistan's views on "religious sympathy", "religious sentiments" and "love of the Prophet". Things seem to be moving towards their negation even though they don't want to. The sooner Pakistan finds an emotional and logical conclusion to this situation, the better. "

Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS , Analysis in religious political perspective part 1

        The modern mentality is so powerful that under its mere influence, the head of the "source of Islam" country said that ninety percent of the shepherds are liars. The book that is going to be numbered in the future, and the way in which it will be confined to the Arab tribes of fourteen hundred years ago while explaining the importance of perspective, will be seen by future generations if we do not see it. Lies have to be erased in the end. But when lies reign for fourteen hundred years, they cause irreparable damage to mankind.

"Statement of the Saudi Prince MBS and religious political perspective:

        Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said that 90% of the hadiths are weak and contradict the Qur'an and therefore are not binding. Only the Qur'an is worthy of obedience. It is as if his statement has challenged not only the Islamic status of some sects of religion and especially the Ahlul-Hadeeth, but also all the Pakistanis who considered the Ahadith as part of religion and faith. In the light of such hadiths, this class did not indulge in any form of bullying in the legislation, curriculum and politics in the country, now its religious status is also going to be challenged. 

        Now their religious position seems to be in dire straits. The same problem is called "don't go away, don't go away". For the past three or four decades, however, Pakistani devotees have considered themselves uninvited and self-proclaimed Allama and Mashaikh. All these sects have succeeded in making laws such as "blasphemy of the companions, blasphemy of the religion and blasphemy of the Prophet" in the light of the hadiths. Even in family law, the "ulema and shaykhs" of the same sect made a great fuss. 

        Whether it is halal or the issue of marriage of a girl to a lesser Sunni, whether the marriage is permissible, whether it is permissible and invalid, etc., all these have been explained by these scholars and shaykhs in the light of the hadiths narrated. It seems that this statement of Prince Suleiman is in fact a challenge to the principles of law and jurisprudence and one of its authoritative sources. Now, if we look at the curriculum of these scholars and shaykhs, it becomes clear that they have obstructed science, technology, modern intellectual, philosophical and social sciences. 

        All such interpretations have been made by these so-called scholars in the light of hadiths. He called his religious politics "Yazidi law" and "enforcing God's law on earth and defending it." Wherever the mighty horse of technology and modernity has given him a leg up, wherever he has been compelled to declare the "haraam" and "permissible" things of science and technology lawful, he has narrated similar hadiths. He relied on it and came up with new interpretations. He never apologized to the public, either for making a mistake in the past or for misinterpreting existing interpretations or for the sake of expediency.