Heart Touching post PART 1 LIFE’s TALE

Yesterday a new shiny car was parked in front of Fake Potter's house.

It was talked about all over the village.

Who came to meet ...

I knew Fika would come at the first opportunity and tell me the whole story ...

The same thing happened in the evening when he came and sat on the floor. After asking about the current situation, he started saying ... 

Sir, it is a matter of many years ago. 

Do you remember Aunty Nooran who used to roast grains in the kiln? 

Who had one son Waqar ...

 I said yes man how can I forget the people of my village ...

May God bless you Sahib Ji, Waqar and I used to study in the fifth grade.

At school, there was often a tree in the grass of dignity ...

Sahib Ji used to cry in a corner ...

Master G used to scold him and send him home to show him to Hakim and take medicine.

One day I was sitting near Waqar during half holiday. I opened my mother's hand-made pratha and pickle ...

Sir, when I feel very hungry, isn't it? So, first of all, I remember the pratha made by my mother ... and the fragrance of that pratha disappears in the whole pind.

Find out what magic was in the hands of Sahib Ji Aman ...

Sahib Ji Waqar looked at Pratha and looked away ... 

That one glance revealed all the secrets of his tree ... For the first time in my life, I saw the intestines burning in someone's eyes with hunger. 

Lusty Andrein from the famines of Sahib Ji Waqar ... Hands were sitting in front of the tears as if to say ... 

If even one Athro falls, the illusion will be broken ...

Even before the illusion of dignity was broken,

 I prayed for him and joined him in the meal.

A look at Aristotle's "Jewel"

There are three types of gems in Aristotle's philosophy, two of which are sensory and one non-sensory. That is, two are physical and one is metaphysical. The two senses are a plant, a tree, etc., which are destroyed. 

The second belongs to the human senses, the physical world. Aristotle described them as universes, such as the sun, moon or other planets, etc. 

These are sensations but they cannot be destroyed. But that which is immovable is confirmed by the supernatural, the supernatural, that is, the "mere intellect", which he calls the "first principle" or the "immovable stimulus." 

When it has nothing to do with the senses, it is, according to Aristotle, a purely rational function and formation, and the intellect has the capacity to reflect on its own thought process. 

In the words of Aristotle, "thought or reason thinks on its own." And so she perceives this immobile essence, which is transcendental.

This post is for consideration only. We will now go on to discuss Aristotle's two main concepts, probability and reality. These are the words in English. 

Potentiality and Acctuality.

One thing to keep in mind here is that those friends who consider the intellect as an unknown reflection of the "external world" are not aware of the power of "logic". Logic is purely the science of thought, and no one understood it better than Aristotle, because it was Aristotle who laid the foundations of logic, and it was this logic that ruled the world of thought for two thousand years. 

Therefore, the difference between inductive (experiential, sensory) and derivative (non-sensory, rational) should be kept in mind, in which case it will be possible to understand the real and immense power of the intellect.

Aristotle's words about what I even have explained are as follows:

Since there have been three sorts of substances, two of them physical and one unmovable, regarding the latter we must assert that it's necessary that there should be endless unmovable substance. For substances are the primary of existing things, and if they're all destructible, all things are destructible.

Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book 9, Sec, 6

The intellect isn't just the camera. The intellect processes conceptual laws or structures by processing some logical principles. during this way you'll compare the intellect ( brain process) with the digital process. AI in computers is predicated on logical algorithms.

If the intellect isn't a mirrored image of the external world, then what's it that man acquires from his material world? All materialism is predicated thereon . The intellect is evolutionary in nature, but during this evolutionary process going beyond physics is additionally one among the essential characteristics of the intellect.

Dude, that's impossible . If you transcend medicine, then it isn't possible to elucidate things completely, especially things that are not beyond medicine. I even have said that Kant wrote the primary critique and Hegel wrote it in logic and therefore the history of philosophy confirms this. Aristotle also considered the intellect to be superior to the soul, on the grounds that the intellect itself can reflect on its own function, without the help of the senses.

Aristotle's philosophy draws these three conclusions

Ghazali, "Tahafat al-Falasfa" and Takfir of philosophers

The study of Ghazali's book "Tahafat-ul-Falasfa" was completed. The conclusions I had drawn from reading it in 2006, and the impressions that were on my mind, this time I have rejected most of them myself. The book contains high level logical discussions. Ghazali sums up the conclusions of the philosophers Ibn Sina and al-Farabi that "logic must be strong." And then Ghazali agrees with Ibn Sina and al-Farabi and writes that "this is correct." Ghazali goes on to say that it is incumbent upon us to "follow in their footsteps word for word, and to debate with them in this book in their language, that is, in the logic which is their interpretation." Philosopher, pages 96-97).

Therefore, it should be noted that Ghazali did not contradict the interpretations of Ibn Sina and Farabi by applying any "religious or inspired" formula, but used logic for this. Religion, which is itself a collection of contradictions, is incapable of talking about philosophy and logic, because it has to be philosophical and logical. In the history of philosophy, the rejection of a philosophy using philosophical and logical arguments is a general attitude, not surprising. Ghazali's failure, however, is that he was able to expose some of the contradictions but could not dissolve them, as Fakhta used the canteen method to analyze the contradictions in Kant's philosophy.

I will write on this subject in some detail, but for the time being I have to briefly discuss the fatwa which Ghazali issued on the last page of Tahafat al-Falasafah and applied it to the three conclusions of Ibn Sina and Farabi. Is.

1. Ibn Sina and Farabi accepted the conclusion of Aristotle's philosophy that the universe is ancient, it has no beginning in time.

2: Ibn Sina also quoted Aristotle's conclusion that God knows only the Universal, he is free from the knowledge of the Particular.

3: Ibn Sina and al-Farabi also concluded that souls cannot occur in these bodies after death, but that the survival of the soul is impossible.

Ghazali says that "this belief of the philosophers is blatant blasphemy" (Tahafat, p. 539). Ghazali has called these three conclusions of Ibn Sina and Farabi 'takfiri' and 'apostasy' and has made it obligatory to kill anyone who expresses or propagates these views. That is, this fatwa of Ghazali was against Ibn Sina and Farabi. According to this fatwa, both are obligatory to be killed. Ghazali's reason is that it threatens to mislead ordinary Muslims.

It should be noted that Ghazali has discussed a total of twenty points in Tahafat al-Falasfa. Ghazali's words about them are as follows: "Except for the three that we have quoted from the philosophers, all of them have been said by some sect of Muslims." (Tahafat, 539) ۔

Regarding the three points we have mentioned above, Ghazali's objection to philosophers is that they could not prove their non-existence. But keep in mind that Ghazali himself could not prove his 'existence'. The only point is that these points give rise to the idea that the prophets are liars. So these results are not correct. Ghazali's words are: "These three issues are in no way compatible with Islam. His followers consider the Prophets to be liars." (Tahafat, p. 538).

The thoughtful expression of Abu Bakr Razi & Good and evil social evolution

The field of medicine dominated Europe until the seventeenth century. Some Western thinkers have even put it above Ibn Sina. Regrettably, Razi's philosophical views were buried in the religious world.

I had posted some time ago that if the concepts of good and evil have been placed in man and the intellect is active, then there is no need for revelation, this was my own thinking.

I did not know much about Abu Bakr Razi's intellectual affairs, but I was surprised to see his philosophical views. Razi says that if the concepts of good and evil have been inculcated and the intellect has the identity of good and evil, then there is no need for "prophecy".

I have read ten articles on Razi in the last eight days, and it is worth noting that in the 21st century, there has been a proliferation of books on Abu Bakr Razi. Read for yourself and draw conclusions.

Good and evil are the result of social evolution. Nothing is predetermined here. For example, in the time of Abraham, human beings used to sacrifice human beings. That is why if you chose to sacrifice one of your sons, the social norms of the time did not object. This process continued till the time of Hazrat Omar who stopped the last sacrifice which was in the form of a virgin and was offered on the river Nile! Revelation did not descend on Hazrat Omar. But by that time social evolution had reached such a stage that the intellect had begun to go through such nonsense! The prohibition of alcohol in the Qur'an itself came later and the advice of Hazrat Omar was banned first. I can also give thousands of examples of good and evil for which I have to write a separate office. You see, due to social evolution and the height of consciousness, countless theological precepts have become almost obsolete. It is becoming difficult to implement the commandments and prohibitions in the Islamic countries themselves!

Drop scene of gang rape and theft with Shujaabad bride.

But the question here is that if we cannot call the action of one woman the action of all women, then how can we attribute the abuse committed by one man to all men ???

Four or five days ago, a news spread like wildfire and reached me that at three o'clock in the night, the robbers entered the wedding house in the guise of policemen and took the family members hostage for an hour. The bride was also beating her husband. In addition, 5 tons of gold was looted and fled. As soon as I saw this news on the website of a national TV channel, I rebuked it. It was indeed a tragic incident which reminded me of the motorway tragedy some time ago.

I started criticizing the government and the concerned police for how long such incidents will continue.

How long will the dignity of women in Pakistan be returned like this?

The other day my team informed me that you were very upset and emotional about this matter and see what is the real truth of this incident.

Now look at the other side of the picture.

The bride herself had called her acquaintance home ... The medical report proved that only one accused had been abused. Police traced the accused through the bride's mobile data and conducted raids for arrest.

When the other side of the concept was shown to me, I couldn't believe it. I told them to wait longer and forbade them to break the news. But unfortunately this is true and this incident was a planned incident. Eventually it was revealed that no one else in the guise of robbers was the bride's own called lover. The accused is a young man of Chauhan family and a resident of Galewal area of ​​Lodhran. The bride has to look her best during this time, because of posterity more than anything else. And the honor of the two families was tarnished. This woman had descended as a torment on the noble men of the world and at the same time she had tried to defame the police uniform.

In our society, a woman is considered oppressed and weak, but sometimes a woman does what no one can think of. In front of the person with whom she got married, she fulfilled the physical desire of the acquaintance and made up the story that The gang-rape report with me proved that only one person was raped, not the woman herself.

This woman did not even think of honoring her parents. She also buried the honor of those who married her and brought her home. What would have happened to the bridegroom who was disgraced on the first night? I wish the truth of this incident would not come to light. I wish people would think that the robbers had committed mass rape during the robbery.

The whole story came out from the girl's mobile. I often say don't just call women oppressed. The reality is very bitter. Men are more oppressed than women in this society.

She wronged her brothers, she wronged her father, she wronged her relatives, and when she did not find peace, she wronged the family in which she married, and the husband with whom she married a woman. How many men were buried in honor?

Train the Christian boys, not Christian girls

            A Christian boy has no way of making money or a girl. He is not interested in seeing the pinnacle of his studies, nor is he interested in making his mark in business. He has neither the manners of conversation nor the idea of ​​cleanliness. In such a case, only a girl can feel pity (being in good shape has not been discussed here yet).

But it's not all the boys' fault. The father of employment in our community is unique. The most powerful people in any community are politicians, bureaucrats, educated, skilled or business people. But the strongest of us is either the bishop or the person who has a relationship with whites outside. Other politicians come to the assemblies with money while our Christian politicians only come under the Tarla Mission. They have no money and no vote bank. Hindus, Parsis, Baha'is and Ahmadis are also minorities in Pakistan, but they are not running the business of religion and NGOs like us. Hindus make money from here.

They don't get any money from India. In Sindh, the business of every chief is in the hands of an upper caste Hindu. Fifteen out of thirty professors in Nawabshah Medical College are Hindus. The entire liquor business is in the hands of Hindus or Parsis. Our Christians sell five to ten bottles and eat police shoes. Cheela Ram, the current chairman of the National Minority Commission, is one of Pakistan's largest rice traders. These are just a few examples.

However, instead of taking lessons from other minorities, we have trained our youth that since nothing can happen here because you are a Christian, you should go out or get a job in a missionary company for a few rupees. Take There were some effects of this dead heart.

He wants to train the boy to snatch his share of livelihood from the market. But we are telling him to protest that society is dirty and based on injustice. Now he is waiting for the society to become peaceful and just so that it can develop. Mr. Market is a jungle where justice and rights do not require cunning, ingenuity, punctuality and courage. Where one's survival requires the indifference to cut through the other. But we are waiting for our rights, which do not seem possible before the Day of Judgment. I mean, there will be no oil and Radha will not dance (by the way, it is clear from this example).

Evaluate our frustration, many Christian men are even afraid to open the door and push the women of the house forward. They hide the boys in the house and send the girl to earn money. All over Pakistan, such incidents have one thing in common. In homes where Christian girls are abandoned in this way, poverty usually reigns, with non-Christian men coming into the house who own everything from their bedrooms to their kitchens. What is cooked at home is also decided by their will. Even in recent incidents, the mothers of these girls are visible, but their brothers and fathers are almost missing on social media.

Of course, this is not the case in all homes, and not all Christians, and not all Christian girls are prone to conversion. There are many who are devoting their lives to the betterment of their families. There are many who are not finding a suitable relationship in their community despite their best efforts but are not willing to give up their religion even though many are willing to show them paradise in the world, provided they change their religion. ۔

Therefore, boys need to be encouraged to improve their source of income and also need to be encouraged that even if they are Christians, if they dare, they will be able to earn better in Pakistan.

The Muslims Scientists & their Ends Al-Kindi Yaqoob , Ibn-e- Rushd , Ibn-e-Sina , Zakaria Al-Razi

            The fate of Muslim scientists at the hands of Muslims is not known to the public. 

Today it is proudly said that he was our Muslim scientist. 

                                Here is a brief history of four of these scientists.

 

Al-Kindi Yaqoob

He was an expert in philosophy, physics, mathematics, medicine, music, chemistry and astronomy. When the caliph, who was opposed to Al-Kindi's thought, came to power, Al-Kindi's library was confiscated and he was publicly flogged at the age of sixty to please the mullah. Al-Kandi screamed in pain at every whip and the spectators laughed.

 

Ibn Rushd

Ibn Rushd, a well-known Andalusian scholar who played a key role in the European Renaissance, was burned at the stake. According to a tradition, he was tied to the pillar of the mosque and the worshipers spat in his face. This great scholar spent the last days of his life in a state of humiliation and anonymity.

 

Ibn-e-Sina

Ibn Sina, the founder of modern medicine, was also declared a heretic and an apostate. Various rulers followed him and he hid to save his life. He wrote his book, which was taught for six hundred years in the universities of the East and the West, Law in Medicine, in hiding.

 

Zakaria Al-Razi

The great philosopher, chemist, astronomer and physician Zakaria Al-Razi was declared a liar, atheist and infidel. The ruler of the time ordered that Razi's book be struck on his head until either the book was torn or Razi's head was torn. In this way, Razi became blind due to repeated head-scratching of books and could never see till death.