ads2

Tuesday 5 July 2022

The Universe - Cosmos and Solar System

The universe is about 14 billion years old and our solar system is about 4.7 billion years old. That is, our solar system came into being about 9.3 billion years after the creation of the universe. Our Earth was formed during the same period of 4.7 billion years, ie within a few million years of the formation of the solar system, the Earth and other planets came into existence.


But our own solar system did not form as the only system of stars / planets in the entire universe, but all the stars that are seeing us with their own eyes at the moment, some planets must be revolving around them. There are. There is hardly a star that is orbiting a planet. In our own galaxy alone, there are more than one trillion stars, meaning something or other. One trillion stars must have one or more planets around it. And the process of star formation continues in different galaxies and newer stars / planets are coming into existence. But there is a universal principle of the universe that whatever is created must perish. These stars will also disappear one day or another.


Astronomers have described the extinction of our planet as a result of the Earth being consumed by a giant black hole, falling prey to a star's supernova, colliding with a very large asteroid, or its own planets. To fall prey to a consuming galaxy, a burst of gamma rays, a big rip or the death of heat in our universe. But one of the biggest reasons for the future destruction of our planet, scientists say, is the death of our sun. When it becomes a red giant, it will kill the orbiting planets near it. In this way the earth will be completely destroyed.


But there are still about seven and a half billion years left until this catastrophe. But millions of years before this catastrophe, life will end in our world. According to a scientific estimate, four billion years from now, due to the abundance of greenhouse gases on Earth, this planet will become a living hell like Venus, where it will be impossible for all life on Earth to survive. Our planet could support another 1.5 billion years of life, but gradually there will be an increase in anti-life factors. And then there will come a time when our planet will be completely dead. As the sun rises, it will disappear completely from the face of the earth. But will the universe end with the end of the earth or the sun?


No, the universe will survive, and the universe will die after many trillions of years. When new stars stop forming. By that time, many more stars would have formed and formed their own new solar system. When 5 billion years have passed since the end of the earth, an intelligent creature like us may be born somewhere on a star planet that can think exactly like us and run its own life system. But this creature will never know that a planet called Earth once revolved around a planet called the Sun, where a creature called a human ruled. At that time, our status has been completely forgotten and all our cultural traces have been destroyed along with the earth. If man did not step out of the earth, then there would be hardly any intelligent being in the whole universe who would know anything about man.

Uncle Ghalib a famous Poet and Science with theory

I like Ghalib very much. There is no doubt that no other eloquent and eloquent poet like Ghalib has been born in the subcontinent. Naseer-ud-Din Shah ordered Ghalib in Gulzar's play "Ghalib". Most of Ghalib's ghazals were sung by Jagjit and what a wonderful song. Now that I like Ghalib and science too, I often look for science in Ghalib's poetry.
An example of a mighty lion is:

Ah should have an age effect
Who has lived to be the head of your hair?

When I read Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, time is actually relativity and can pass at different speeds in different frames of reference. So I said, oh wow, how great it was that the Theory of Relativity was given half a century before Einstein.
Similarly, Ghalib had another lion:

Whose grief is the cure for death?
Candles burn in every color until dawn

So I deduced that Ghalib actually knew that white light is made up of different colors.

Now, if I conclude that Ghalib incorporated many modern science concepts into his poetry, I would be mistaken.
Ghalib was a poet, not a scientist. He summed up his human condition in poetry. Ghalib never claimed that he became a scientist because of these few poems.
The reason is very simple, it makes no sense to claim that scientific ideas are presented in the air or in a vague way. Unless you formulate a complete scientific theory with the help of mathematics or with the help of experiments and observations, it has no significance in science. It doesn't matter if you shake your fist, wave your fist in the air and get angry about why the world and science are not accepting your vague ideas.
It is very easy to get his attention after an incident. After Einstein's theory, it is very easy to find this theory from Ghalib's poetry. All you have to do is pull out a few words, exaggerate and change the meaning of the words to prove that Ghalib added Einstein's theory to his poetry. The hearers will rejoice. A term can be used for this. Reverse engineering.
 
This is how you can draw science pigeons out of poetry or any non-scientific book like an expert magician.

Science is the name of proving a process not by arguments but by experiments !

If someone claims that he can do something wrong with his arguments based on scientific experiments and tries to argue with you, never waste the time in arguing with him because he is a scientist. Not aware of the basic process.

That is why we discard the pointless discussion in this group as it is a huge obstacle in the way of those who learn the facts and wastes the energy of those who are knowledgeable.

remember

In science, if one thing has been proved by experiment rather than observation, then only experiments can be considered in response to it, and also those experiments in which previous experiments have been proved wrong.

Everything else will be this person's personal opinion!

As it has been proved at this time that the earth is elliptical, now as much as one wants to claim and give arguments, science throws these arguments in the trash without hearing them.

So is evolution.

Dozens of research papers are published on this subject every month and in them, scientists are proving evolution by finding new links. Now, if someone says that you should argue with him because he can disprove you and your evolution with "arguments", then it is very important to get rid of such a person.

Because,

The scientific credibility of the person under whom he is speaking is zero. If I have to talk about the fact that evolution is wrong (the whole process), then first of all I have to prove somewhere in my research that one and a half scientific mechanisms that can prove evolution are wrong. Then I have to go and claim that yes I can now disprove evolution and I have evidence of my experience.

But,

In Pakistan or in many parts of the world, people like Flat Arthur, who are averse to evolution, try to argue arguments that have been disproved twenty to thirty years ago. Or they may have heard the arguments of a new European creationist and claim that I can disprove evolution in this way, but such people have not heard the scientific and empirical refutation of these arguments.

And

Since most people belong to non-scientific backgrounds, they play religion cards and try to argue in order to humiliate the next person. It is better to give up than to argue.

Because doing so will not prove science wrong but will save your energy which you can use in a better place.

for this,

Avoid anyone who tells you that he can refute science with his arguments, because it is a waste of time to discuss with someone who has no scientific background and no knowledge of scientific procedure. Self-satisfaction.

Just remember one thing,

One thing that has been proven experimentally in science is that the arguments against it should be strengthened as much as possible and whether it is forced to change the name of its book like Copernicus or it is forced like Galileo to die. The fact that it has been put in the mouth cannot be proved wrong.

Science puts experiments ahead of verbal arguments. If one does not have an experimental rejection, he can reject science for his own psychological satisfaction, but science remains the same because science is the name of knowing the truth and reality does not need arguments.

What is the reason that human life is getting shorter ?

Human skeletons have been discovered which were much older than us. Now why do we die at a young age?

the answer. The average age of human beings has been increasing rapidly for the last one or two centuries, not decreasing. And there are more elderly people in the world today than at any other time in the history of mankind. Maternal and child mortality rates are touching the lowest levels. Achieving these milestones is the key to the tremendous development of medical sciences, the best treatment and the abundant availability of food.

As far as the discovery of human skeletons is concerned, not a single skeleton has yet been discovered whose age or height has exceeded that of modern humans. All those discovered were younger.

One of the basic principles of psychology is that once something is believed, it cannot be shaken.

 Be it belief in conspiracy theories, space creatures, political and religious ideology or belief, ghosts or any other form. After reaching the stage of certainty, the door of return is closed.


 Even if any evidence is presented against it. Because this belief is stronger than the truth and comforts the heart.
For some, it becomes so important that if they are challenged, they will be ready to fight.


There is another interesting principle of psychology in this regard which is called backfire effect. The stronger the evidence, the stronger their belief in alternative reality.


That is, instead of changing their opinion by looking at the facts and evidence, their belief in the belief and thinking that they have already accepted becomes stronger and stronger.


An other information about MIGHT / MYTE (an organism)

This creature is called a relative who lives inside our eyelids. It comes out during our sleep at night to walk on your face. Its males and females combine to make pollen on your face. Its female lays 20 to 24 eggs inside each of your eyelid hairs. The job of this relative is to refresh the dead skin of our face daily, which we are performing natural cosmetic procedures while sleeping.


Large Hadron Collider LHC is about to resume scientific experiments

CERN officials have announced that after a three-year hiatus, scientific operations on the Large Hadron Collider will resume on July 5, 2022. This is the same collider that discovered the Higgs boson exactly ten years before today, in 2012, after which the standard model of quantum physics was completed, that is, all the basic particles that were predicted in the standard model have been discovered.

This collider is the most powerful machine in the world in which protons are accelerated in a very powerful magnetic field which generates immense kinetic energy in them - then the beams of these protons collide with each other causing the protons to explode. And by their combined energy new particles are formed - by studying these particles we try to create a better understanding of the formation of the universe and the evolution of the universe from the Big Bang to the present.

Three years ago today, this machine was shut down for major upgrades - in these three years, its magnets have been made more powerful, the number of protons in the beam of protons has increased, this beam has been adjusted accurately. The ability to focus has been improved so that more protons can collide with each other in a very small area, increasing the likelihood of particles that have seldom formed before.

Since the upgrade, the overall performance of this collimator has improved almost 23 times compared to 2012, which will help in the discovery of new particles and new fundamental forces of the universe.

When the Higgs boson was discovered in 2012, there were so few Higgs bosons being produced that it was extremely difficult to study their properties. Dan Higgs will study the mechanism of decay of the boson and will also study the particles that are formed as a result of the decay of the Higgs boson.

In the last few months, there have been signs of a new particle in many particle accelerators. The standard model predicts that the decay rate of electrons and muons should be exactly the same, but in some experiments the decay rate of muons is higher than expected. It's like a hunt for meowns interacting with another elementary particle that we don't know about. Soon after the resumption of the LHC, the issue of Mayon's decay rate will be resolved and it is quite possible that in the next few years a new core particle will be detected which will allow for the modification of the standard model.

Let science is to be science

Our people are so naive that they want the scientists of the world to research science according to their will and in any case draw conclusions that they think are correct. What does this show? This shows that people in our country do not know how science works. There are some basic principles of scientific research and science is not made for the purpose of making someone happy, satisfying one's ego or making someone hateful or angry. Scientists do not go to the laboratory thinking that something has to be proved in every situation. They keep their old ideas outside the laboratory. They go to the laboratory with some questions, the answers to which the universe gives them through experiments.

Science is the best way for man to explore the universe today. If you do not agree with this, then you are in doubt because most of the factors in your life depend on the pattern of science and the inventions it has acquired.

But our naive people insist that scientific research be done according to their will and thinking. The ground realities, however, are that Pakistan ranks 99th in the Global Innovation Index, which is a measure of innovation.

Our general attitude towards science is that science that does not conform to their ideas is thrown in the trash. If science is what they think it is, they thrive, but if the same science uses the same methods to disprove their ideas through hundreds of experiments and observations, they say either science is wrong, or Or science has not yet reached the point where it can comprehend reality.
What is the solution to all this complexity? This is the only solution
That science should be left as science. Science is the knowledge of this world, and science is necessary to live in this world, whether you like it or not.

How To Get a Job In Canada For Free, Canada Immigration , Canada Free Work Visa 2022

 latest updates are coming soon and further more detail .....

please wait... 



LIMIA 



IMP.. PROGRAMMMM





Essay: Importance of English Language

English language is considered as the most popular language in the world. It is spoken by billions of people from different countries and cu...