If someone claims that he can do something wrong with his arguments based on scientific experiments and tries to argue with you, never waste the time in arguing with him because he is a scientist. Not aware of the basic process.
That is why we discard the pointless discussion in this group as it is a huge obstacle in the way of those who learn the facts and wastes the energy of those who are knowledgeable.
remember
In science, if one thing has been proved by experiment rather than observation, then only experiments can be considered in response to it, and also those experiments in which previous experiments have been proved wrong.
Everything else will be this person's personal opinion!
As it has been proved at this time that the earth is elliptical, now as much as one wants to claim and give arguments, science throws these arguments in the trash without hearing them.
So is evolution.
Dozens of research papers are published on this subject every month and in them, scientists are proving evolution by finding new links. Now, if someone says that you should argue with him because he can disprove you and your evolution with "arguments", then it is very important to get rid of such a person.
Because,
The scientific credibility of the person under whom he is speaking is zero. If I have to talk about the fact that evolution is wrong (the whole process), then first of all I have to prove somewhere in my research that one and a half scientific mechanisms that can prove evolution are wrong. Then I have to go and claim that yes I can now disprove evolution and I have evidence of my experience.
But,
In Pakistan or in many parts of the world, people like Flat Arthur, who are averse to evolution, try to argue arguments that have been disproved twenty to thirty years ago. Or they may have heard the arguments of a new European creationist and claim that I can disprove evolution in this way, but such people have not heard the scientific and empirical refutation of these arguments.
And
Since most people belong to non-scientific backgrounds, they play religion cards and try to argue in order to humiliate the next person. It is better to give up than to argue.
Because doing so will not prove science wrong but will save your energy which you can use in a better place.
for this,
Avoid anyone who tells you that he can refute science with his arguments, because it is a waste of time to discuss with someone who has no scientific background and no knowledge of scientific procedure. Self-satisfaction.
Just remember one thing,
One thing that has been proven experimentally in science is that the arguments against it should be strengthened as much as possible and whether it is forced to change the name of its book like Copernicus or it is forced like Galileo to die. The fact that it has been put in the mouth cannot be proved wrong.
Science puts experiments ahead of verbal arguments. If one does not have an experimental rejection, he can reject science for his own psychological satisfaction, but science remains the same because science is the name of knowing the truth and reality does not need arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment