The national system protects individuals and communities in markets, public parks, amusement parks and highways.

There are rules and regulations for the protection of social etiquette.  This does not mean that social power and guiding principles are not ingrained in the minds of the people of the society side by side with the laws.  The truth is that social values ​​along with laws are also guardians of social etiquette.  Some rich people stop doing that.  The purpose of the national system is to protect the activities of individuals and groups in public places.  In fact, when a person is away from home or family, only religious and social values ​​are effective in controlling his character and speech.  These values ​​are the guardians of rights and duties.

 The scope of public places extends to schools, colleges, universities, event centers, parks and recreational areas, but the scope of public places is not limited to this.  Shops, malls, cafes, theaters and markets also fall into this category.  Occasionally activities and dispositions contrary to national temperament, morals and etiquette are observed in these places.  Every attempt to turn these places into centers of anxiety, distress and anguish instead of centers of entertainment, pleasure and excitement must be stopped.  This work is done through national tastes, temperament, social etiquette and morals.

 For example, some boys imitate girls or girls dress like boys.  The girls adopt the trick shield boys.  The boys began to adopt methods contrary to the national spirit. These are things that cannot be controlled by law.  These are things that cannot be stopped by government officials.  Religious, social etiquette and morality can be used to control every act which the common people consider immoral and contrary to social temperament and culture.

 Economic and industrial enterprises are, of course, privately owned, but if there are activities against social tastes, etiquette and manners within a factory or an economic entity, and there are regular harassment for it, then the government officials should intervene.  They cannot sit still, but they must intervene to protect the national order and prevent an atmosphere of social law and order from eroding.  There may be provocative activities.  It is the duty of the government to control them.

 In the end, I think it is appropriate to say that social etiquette has its own identity in every society.  In our society, protection of social etiquette is considered to be the main goal of respect for national temperament and tastes and administrative powers.  In other words, it is a pillar of our national system.  In this regard, it is not necessary to exceed the limits by directly harming the national system.  I would also like to add here that with regard to such mistakes, the people have become moderate in distinguishing between good and evil.  The norm in our society is that they have a special taste for violating social etiquette towards individuals and groups.  Our society has adopted ancestral ways of preserving social traditions and customs.  It is an integral part of our intellectual security.  Its protection is obligatory. Therefore, there is no place for stubbornness, stubbornness, rebellion against social norms or parental freedom against the practice of social etiquette.