In order to question anything, it is necessary to first get the knowledge of the thing and then talk. Questioning anything without knowing the alphabet is a very unscientific attitude.
This kind of unscientific attitude towards science is common in our society. A person who has not studied science regularly, instead of questioning his scientific educational qualifications, directly questions the well-established principles of science. And on top of that, the position of this person on the questions raised on the basis of lack of knowledge is that the person in front should prove it wrong by giving "arguments".
Even the answers to the questions raised on the principles of science will be given using scientific logic. On the one hand, you do not have a basic knowledge of science, on the other hand, you have directly challenged science instead of acquiring knowledge, and further you are asking for "arguments" that your unscientific and unscientific behavior The questions raised on the grounds should be answered more scientifically. My dear compatriots, this is wrong. In that case you will not be able to learn anything and the one in front will not be able to teach you anything.
Let's take an example from the history of science.
Newton, Galileo, Maxwell and Einstein are big names in the field of science.
The laws of motion discovered by Galileo and Newton are sufficient to describe the movement of objects at speeds much lower than the speed of light in ordinary life. Now anyone who has studied these laws knows that in Newtonian mechanics there is no restriction on the speed of objects. You may have noticed that two vehicles coming from opposite directions pass by each other very fast. If one vehicle is moving to the right at a speed of 50 kmph and the other is coming to the left at a speed of 60 kmph, then their speed will be 110 kmph depending on each other. That is, in this case, their relative speeds relative to each other are equal to the sum of their individual speeds. That is why a vehicle passing in the opposite direction passes by us very fast.
But if two vehicles are traveling in the same direction at speeds of 50 kilometers per hour and 60 kilometers per hour, then the speeding car seems to be moving very slowly when it overtakes a slow moving car. Because in this case their relative speeds relative to each other are equal to the difference of their individual speeds. That is 10 kilometers per hour.
Now let's link this to the non-stop speed mentioned above. We replace a car with a light beam. The speed of light is about 300,000 kilometers per second. The other vehicle is being replaced by an observer in the opposite direction of the beam at a speed of 1 km per second. According to the above, the speed of light for this observatory should be 300,001 kmph. And if the Observer is coming at a speed of 10 kmph, then the speed of light should be 300,010 kmph for it.
But the principles applied to vehicles do not apply to lighting. The existence of electromagnetic waves was predicted in the second half of the nineteenth century when James Clerk Maxwell presented his theory of electromagnetism by combining the principles of electricity and magnetism. Light, radio waves, X-rays, etc. are electromagnetic phenomena. But there was something special about Maxwell's theory, and that was the speed constant of the electromagnetic waves. That is, no matter what the observer moves in terms of these views, the speed of those views will always be constant. The speed of all electromagnetic waves is only 300,000 kilometers per second. Now this was against Newtonian mechanics. Short story short, electromagnetic waves were detected before the end of the 19th century and it was concluded that the speed of light (electromagnetic waves) does not follow the principles of Newtonian mechanics. But the problem was that Newton's principles were also well established.
Now here is Einstein's entry.
After completing his graduation, Einstein could not find a teaching job, so he started working as a clerk. But science has not given up.
Einstein studied science regularly, knew Newtonian mechanics, and was well acquainted with Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetrum. The theory of electromagnetism was more powerful than Newtonian mechanics. Einstein presented his theory of special relativity, with Newtonian mechanics on the sidelines, assuming the theory of electromagnetism to be a constant of speed of light. Einstein, who wrote a research paper on the Special Theory of Relativity, was still a clerk.
Special Theory of Relativity was a turning point in the history of physics. This theory changed the way people think about space and time. If you have ever heard of spacetime, it is a product of this theory. In addition, new phenomena such as time dilation, length contraction and mess energy interconversion (E = mc ^ 2) were predicted and evidence of these phenomena was found in practice.
On the one hand, the Law of Conservation of Mess proved to be wrong with Mess Energy Interconversion and on the other hand, the way was opened for the use of nuclear energy. Today, the Special Theory of Relativity is one of the most successful theories in science
And more importantly, Newton's well-established principles still exist in special theory today. Newtonian mechanics is just a good approximation of the special theory of relativity, if the objects move at a much lower speed than the speed of light. And the speed of most objects seen in real life (car, plane, bird, man, wind, etc.) is much lower than the speed of light.
And all of this was possible because Einstein, being a basic knower of science, questioned Newtonian mechanics after studying electromagnetism and Newtonian mechanics. If Einstein had been a man of unscientific and unscientific thinking, he would have questioned any scientific knowledge without knowing the alphabet of science, I don't know anyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment