No Exit from American author Daniel Marke

Book: * No Exit from American author Daniel Marke writes in his book "New Exit from Pakistan" that we Americans cannot leave Pakistan, he gives three reasons.

 * The first reason - Pakistan's nuclear and missile program is so large and extensible that we have to constantly engage with Pakistan to keep an eye on it.

 * Second reason ... Pakistan is the only country in the world which has deep ties with China's civil-military leadership.

 👈 The third reason is that Pakistan has such a large army that it can destabilize not only the region but the whole world. It is also important to stay engaged with Pakistan to keep an eye on the Pakistan Army.

 "We decided 72 years ago that Pakistan could not be allowed to develop and that Pakistan could not be allowed to lead the Islamic world," he added. Some of the ways we have done this are to de-stabilize Pakistan so that we can manage and de-stabilize in such a way that we buy Pakistani leaders including political leaders, civil bureaucracy officers and journalists. There are also media houses ...

 پاکستانی Daniel Marke writes in his book that Pakistani leaders sell themselves at a very low price, so low that they get a visa to go to America or their children get scholarships and on such a small thing they have Pakistan's interests. Ready to sell.

Point of No Return

 We are a confused, sad, untrained and helpless generation.

 Our parents do not have time to sit back and talk, because in our country there is a fierce competition for employment.

  Our teachers don't have time to teach us basic manners and ethics because they have to instill more curriculum in our minds in less time.

 No one answers our questions but everyone asks for answers to our deeds. No one has the time and style to train us but everyone is ready to point the finger at training. We are not taught to maintain relationships, but we are to blame when relationships are broken. We are not shown morality in practice, but we are cursed for imitating immorality.

 We are taught love stories, but we are humiliated for making love. We are not taught how to love and nurture. To love or not to love? No one answers this question.

 We are encouraged to dream in our childhood, we are instructed to set a goal but by putting question marks and walls in front of all our dreams we are forced to walk in the same direction in the same row.

 We are not asked for opinions because we are ignorant, we are not allowed to believe in our thoughts and intentions because we are inexperienced. We are not taught the ways and means of living because no one considers it their responsibility. Everyone feels it is the responsibility of the other class and sector so no one is ready to take this raft.

 After all that we become, then we are ridiculed and those before us are given priority over us. We are rebuked and the poems of the past are recited.

 Where is our fault? Who has spoiled us? Why are we so confused, so ignorant, so immoral and so outspoken? Why aren't our minds clear? Why are our hearts not clean? What have we done wrong that makes us what we are today?

 Think ....!!!

What was the Charter of Democracy ?

I hope Imran has understood well today. We wanted to save him from the tragic consequences that befell him. We knew this was going to happen, but we had no idea. It was the League and the PPP that did not want to make any deal with the people who brought Imran, otherwise he would have perished a year later.

The Charter of Democracy was that no matter what happens, they will not become instruments of any non-political force against each other. It was Benazir and Nawaz Sharif who, after going through similar bitter experiences, realized that power was being used by them. This was the reason why later Zardari and Nawaz Sharif, despite their differences, did not become instruments of any power to overthrow each other's government which Imran used to call for.

Coming to the requested power, Imran treated his political opponents badly. Make false claims. Personally attacked them. Defamed them. Dr. Arsalan conducted a social media trial of his daughters-in-law. Spread false corruption stories on media. In return for a few days of government and then in the rain of kicks and punches to leave power!

We were not at all happy with his fate, but he suffered because of his actions. He spread hatred and today he is cutting hatred. He considered political opponents as personal opponents. Made politics a war. In order to win, he crossed every legal and illegal limit. Now that his stories will come out, there will be a media trial, corruption cases will be opened, NAB will be set up, then the holiday milk will be remembered. The flatterer will not be seen back and forth, he will travel alone.

In that case, if possible, keep your tongue clean. Think of politics as politics. And come out of the narcissism and face the facts that are big bhajang. Keep up the good content. The good times will come again. Sitting in the assembly. Legislate. Help to remove loopholes in the constitution. Consider the Assembly as a sacred house which is not a private house of the people of Pakistan. Respect other leaders including the people. If he tells, he will encourage you to listen!

New World Order (NWO) USA and Pakistani Politics part - ii

In neocolonialism, the method of directly occupying governments has changed. The imperialist countries now form the government of their choice, and this is the strategy that the local powers have learned. This is also the practice of the Pakistani hawaldars now that they seem to be manipulating from the inside out and forming the government of their choice. We have a living example of this. It is said in Punjabi that "One by one they collected firewood."

The rest of the liberals, who are basically captives of their own deep prejudices, are not even capable of seeing the whole process, their eyes begin to glaze over when a "big picture" is presented to them. Ten percent salary increase, so go to the "establishment" hell, look at your interest. If the violations of the constitution fall into the hands of the hawaldar, then there is no problem, because apparently everything is in accordance with the constitution. Can anyone say that the PTI came in an unconstitutional way?

If it was due to Hawaldar and it was wrong action then it is also due to Hawaldar then is this action correct? And what is PDM? Did it come without the consent of Hawaldar? And hasn't Hawaldar been a part of it all from the process of becoming a PDM to giving him a government? That is, should we acknowledge that Hawaldar's interference in politics is over? We will admit it, but when the Liberal Party did not win the election, they did not believe it.

The best strategy for forming a government under neo-colonialism is to ensure that no party has a clear majority. Because in that case Hawaldar will have to intervene directly, which is an old tactic, and that is why the PTI did not get a clear majority. The same strategy will be maintained in the next elections. "One One the Wood" will be collected, so that they can live under the shadow of Hawaldar's fear. 

This is the New World Order, which is used locally by those who read and know books. Just as capitalism is a big statement under the "big scenario" and includes many micro-statements, so too the "establishment" is a big statement in the political process, and all political parties are small statements. The Pakistani hawaldar is not only well aware of this New World Order but also has the practical means to put it into practice.

New World Order ( NWO ) USA and Pakistani Politics part - i

The political situation has changed. This is what has been happening in Pakistan's history since day one. Some people think that all this is in accordance with the constitution, it is foolish to think so. It is unconstitutional for Hawaldar not to interfere in politics, not to form governments of his own accord and not to overthrow governments of his own accord. Therefore, the basic thing that has always been unconstitutional is that every government is formed with the blessings of Hawaldar, and this is the unconstitutional act which cannot make any unconstitutional act constitutional. When a businessman commits fraud, he tries to ensure that every document is in accordance with the law, so that he cannot be caught. And when every document is in accordance with the law, it does not mean that there has been no embezzlement. If a robber erases all his marks by committing a robbery, the mark can be erased but the mark of a robber remains anyway. 

It is the result of Pakistan's 70-year political history that there have always been robberies in the political process according to the wishes of Hawaldar, but the mark of robbery cannot be erased. Sometimes the constitution was broken in public, sometimes the constitution was broken in accordance with the constitution, in order to convince the immature minds that everything has happened according to the constitution. The immature minds keep on preaching that the "supremacy of the constitution" has been established. But the fact is that Hawaldar first brought one, then sent him home, and now he brought him back, whom he had sent home earlier. Hawaldar wants to show that he is powerful and his decision is based on the constitution and law. This is the principle of neocolonialism which the local powers have borrowed from the world imperialist powers.

If we look at each other, the whole history of the PPP and Noon League is a history of throwing dirt on each other, a history of calling each other corrupt, thieves, robbers, looters, boot licking and scoundrels, on each other's women. Dirt throwing history. I do not say, but this is the same Noon League about which the PPP has always said that it came into politics sitting on the lap of the old Hawaldar. And this is the same PPP that when it came to power after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Gilani became the Prime Minister and Zardari became the President. 

The PPP was not ready to even mention his name. Everyone knows that Benazir had a 'deal' with Musharraf, but as soon as she reached Pakistan, she deviated from her deal and the end is in front of everyone. Write down our words and say that these allegations are about to start. This unnatural alliance of eleven parties will not last long. This will continue as long as the Hawaldar wants, and as soon as any party claims to be an independent and sovereign party, the same Hawaldar will come into action, and with this party will use the same neocolonialism tactics as the Nawaz League. Was done and now it is being done with PTI.

Unconditional condemnation of wars

Condemnation of wars must be unconditional. Regardless of who is fighting against whom. Withdrawal from reason begins the war. That is, war is an irrational thing in itself, and in capitalist countries there are periods of irrationality when the interests of the capitalists collide with each other and they fail to come up with any rational solution. Exported in case. That is, the intellect turns into its inverse non-intellect.

I am glad that I was born in an age in which people from rationalist liberal societies take to the streets against the war policies of their own governments, regardless of the position of the governments or the nature of the war. Is happening against In the war against Iraq, 3 million people took to the streets in Spain, 2 million in Italy, 1.7 million in France and 1.2 million in Britain to protest against their governments. Came out, and war was opposed at every level. And it never stopped. 

On the contrary, if we talk about religious wars, it is amazing. On the one hand, war is an irrational thing in itself, and on the other hand, when the slogan of expansion of "Divine Religion" is included, the whole country gathers on the basis of this "Divine Religion" and runs against others. There is no attempt to understand what is right and wrong, just take the name of God and impose barbarism. In rationalist, liberal societies there are regular discussions, from universities to public places, dialogues are held, questions and objections are raised as to why this heinous act was committed.

Russia has imposed war barbarism on Ukraine, so before we get into the debate of right and wrong, Russian barbarism should be condemned because nothing can be more wrong than war, war is so wrong that it has to be right. Giving justification is also wrong. When the United States invaded Afghanistan and later Iraq, we condemned the United States and its allies without justification, and wrote many articles against them. Therefore, without getting involved in the debate on who is right and wrong, war should be condemned as much as possible, considering it wrong. Our sympathies are with the people of Ukraine who will be annihilated on the basis of an act they have never done.

Women's Day & their emancipation

Today, on the occasion of "Women's Day", attention was focused on some historical facts. In 1792 the British philosopher Marie Woolen Kraft wrote a book entitled

A Vindication of The Rights of Women

The book presents such rare ideas for women that even today, reading the book, it seems as if it was written in the last decades of the twentieth century.

Rousseau, the forerunner of the French Revolution, was also a staunch Christian at the time. She wrote in her book, Emily, that women should be kept away from rational sciences and confined to the home. In view of these views of Rousseau, Marie Woolen Kraft, who was deeply influenced by the French Revolution, had the opportunity to express her unique views in support of women's rights. Following the publication of the book, Edmund Burke, Britain's "Great Conservative Thinker", was moved and made a lot of fun of Mary Woolen Craft in his book.

My demand was that women need representation in three areas. One is the rational education that is given to men, the other is that they should be given equal opportunity to get involved in politics and the third is that they should be given equal opportunities to work alongside men. 

The situation in Britain today is that 50% of women are doctors, 50% are legislators, 222 women are members of the British Parliament. Are, and four per cent are journalists, while sixty-five per cent of the UK's total workforce. I did my own thing and passed away at the age of only 28.

We have to see if the ideas that are being presented are against the class, is it conservative or progressive? The struggle of women is certainly progressive in itself. Since most other groups and religious parties in Pakistan are conservative, mixing women's voices should be a priority for all "progressives". 

A revolutionary is one who is active, dynamic, and can raise his voice in society at the theoretical and practical level. Ignorant forces and parties are never revolutionary. So salute the struggle of women. Just remember my Woolen Craft in your struggle, and if possible read his book, that book is still helpful in determining the direction of the struggle.

Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of The Rights of Women