Faith Monotheism and Atheism

Believers or atheists, if both of them spend time in improving their morals and character instead of giving advice to others, then I am sure that the common man can be safe from the 'evil' of both of them. The theologian has limited the scope of religion to such an extent that it has become difficult to breathe. 

Fed up with their behavior, many people want to break this "narrow" circle and take refuge in another circle that is a little wider than the circle of religious people, at least they can breathe. That is to say, focus on improving one's actions, leaving the worries of others behind and giving them a higher place in heaven.

I have seen in British, Western and American societies that there is a bar on one corner, a mosque on the other, churches, temples and gurdwaras on the third, fourth and fifth corners. Wherever he wants to go, he goes freely. Problems can arise when one of them, while carrying out a divine service, stops the others from going to their favorite place. 

Impose his will on them, take away their role contract, try to imprison them in his limited circle, so limited that the next moment this person has to be removed from that circle again due to some other action of his. 

Can The same is true of atheists, brothers, congratulations on your atheism! You believe that God does not exist, so do not waste your time and the time of others by discussing things that do not exist. Your atheism and the faith of the theologians are just a means of diverting people's attention from the real issues. Keep atheism and faith to yourself, first find out what the real problems of the people are and then try to solve them.

Maulana Maududi and the woman.

A gentleman has sent me an article about Maududi's wife and said that I need your comment on it. After reading the text, at first I apologized for the logical errors in it, but at his insistence I promised to write a few sentences. Let's go to Maududi first. Maulana says:

"What the West has given to women is not given as women but has been made into men."

The first logical fallacy is that Maududi, by saying "whatever the West has given to women", has driven women out of the West. It is common for women to be Western. The second thing is more interesting than the first. Says:

"In fact, women are still as humiliated in his eyes as they were in the old days of ignorance."

Maududi is admitting that woman was "humiliated" even in the "old age of ignorance". This means that the religion of God, Christianity, spanning over two thousand years was not only the "age of ignorance", but also the woman was considered "humiliated" in this age of Christianity. In short, the two thousand year age of religion was just ignorance, in which woman was not respected. Look at Maududi's second mistake that in the first sentence he said that what he has given to a woman now has made him a "man". In other words, bringing a woman on the image of a man is a disgrace to the woman, therefore the man also remained a "disgrace". That is, the man brought the woman to the level of his "humiliation" and proved that she is also "humiliated". However, it is not so simple. So let's see more. Writes:

"There is still no respect for the queen of the house, the wife of the husband, the mother of the children, a real and genuine woman."

Now, according to the turn they have made, the woman who does not have these "characteristics" should be considered as "humiliated". This means that women in Western society have never been through these relationships, because they themselves have said that they were "humiliated" even in the earlier "age of ignorance", and in their eyes, that is all right. ۔ The rest is their self-made standard, which has nothing to do with Western social life. Mr. Maududi has not stopped here but is making more mistakes. See more:

"If there is honor, it is for a man or a woman who is physically a woman but mentally and mentally a man."

"If there is honor", that is, now they are believing that woman has "honor", whereas before that they have said that woman was "humiliated" before, and still "humiliated". Is. A person who does not know what he is saying is called a teacher of others. Without understanding the values ​​of foreign societies, man does the same stupid things that Maududi has done. Now tell me friends, should I continue reading this foolish article of Maududi or not? Because the next thing about the "dress" is much more stupid, and my enthusiasm has responded.

Maulana Maududi's objection to women's clothing

At the insistence of friends, Maulana Maududi offers another analysis. Maulana says:

"The obvious proof of the mental confusion of the sense of inferiority is that Western women wear men's clothing with pride. However, no man can think of coming out in public wearing women's clothes. "

It is impossible to find an example of the mental and intellectual "inferiority" and narrow-mindedness and moral crisis expressed by Maulvi Maududi in his own words. Maulana has talked about a woman wearing 'pants', jeans etc. And I wonder how ignorant Maulana is of Western culture. In the West, men wear jeans and women also wear jeans (regardless of the fact that government employees cannot wear jeans). As much as there is a difference between men's and women's shalwar kameez in Pakistan, there is also a difference between men's and women's jeans in the West. Go to any big store, there will be a separate section for men's and women's clothing. 

Maulana would also object to women's participation in sports only because of the dress, because in every sport in the world, trousers etc. have to be worn. Now cricket or football cannot be played by wearing shalwar kameez. Maulana will not even know that you can't even go to nightclub wearing jeans here. Maulana's real problem is that woman has slowly broken the orthodox chains of religious ignorance through her struggle. It was deliberately burned alive. 

And the same woman today is teaching thousands of idiots like Maulana sitting in the top universities of Europe and Britain. There are people like Maulana who are captives of the religious ideology of the Age of Ignorance. If they are doing research to make it, then those boys and girls will understand that this person must belong to the "age of consciousness". These are the people who say that their religion has given "rights" to women, such "rights" that they cannot even wear the clothes of their choice.

Iqbal was right:

"Islamic thought has been stagnant for the last five hundred years. There was a time when the world was enlightened by Islam. The most remarkable manifestation of modern history is that the Islamic world is rapidly moving towards the West spiritually. There is nothing wrong with this movement, because the rational aspect of European culture is the expansion of some very important levels of Islamic culture. We are just afraid that the dazzling light of European culture will catch our feet and we will not be able to reach the inside of this culture. "

Intellectually handicapped people like Maulana Maududi had fallen prey to the "dazzling light of European culture", which is why their eyesight was limited to appearances. Has any of the world's great philosophers ever talked about men's or women's clothing? 

Never! But Iqbal was well aware of the philosophical aspects developed by the philosophers, and was convinced of the "spiritual" power of Western society based on their intellectual achievements, which also makes it clear that "spirituality" Has nothing to do with religion and the concept of "dress" by fools like Maulana. What could be more intellectual backwardness of any thinker than to start objecting to the dress of women, when dress is related to culture, and culture grows by its own internal force, breaking the stalemate? It starts with changes in every aspect of culture, not just clothes.

Ethics and morality of a Man

When a man imposes restrictions on a woman's dress or other things, it does not mean that the woman is wrong and unreliable; his only and only meaning is that he himself is wrong and unreliable. The danger he wants to save the woman is the danger himself. He wants to protect the woman from the dirty eyes, those eyes are not the creatures of another planet, if the woman goes out of the house to cover.

 Why? 

Because it stands out, co-education should be banned. Why? 

Because that's part of it. It is just that he kept on downloading millions of scriptures on his own, but in spite of this he could not improve his character and morals.

A woman for whom it has not been possible to identify her independent and free existence in the history of the last five thousand years. Gives. The fact is that he does not accept defeat. He could not face the fact that the fear of death and subsequent punishments and then the greed of the maidens who had given themselves again could not improve his character and morals. They say there is no oppression in religion. 

What a wonderful joke, if there is no coercion in religion then does a woman have the right to freedom of identity? Interestingly, the most feared people about women are these religious mullahs, even though they are the ones who have been training people on the basis of their "holy" books. Because they know that men cannot be trained by religious deceptions, they want to cover not only their homes but the women of the whole society. 

It is straightforward that if your book and you yourself are truthful, then instead of forcing woman, convince yourself (man) of this truth. That is not possible anyway. The man, being aware of the real nature of man and the ineffective and fictitious retribution in the holy books, knows that these books do not have the power to correct man. 

Therefore, on every front, his target is a woman. Remember that in a religious society where there are restrictions on women, understand that these scriptures have failed to train men.

If you look at the centuries-long history, every rule, every rule, every rule, every law was made by this man himself. In which the woman's part is extinct. Despite having so much power, it could not control itself. In any case, the woman has to understand that the scriptures that have not been able to train the man himself, they do not have the ability to protect the woman from the evil of the man, there is no wisdom in them except to impose oppression on the woman, their Keep raising your voice to recognize the reality and to recognize your existence and sovereignty. In the presence of these scriptures, the journey is difficult, but not impossible.

A story of the Day which is special ( Part - II )

The very Next Day , part of that story  

As soon as he opened his eyes in the morning, he quickly washed his face with water and sat back down to read a book. And then with the same continuity I finished the book in five or six days ... After the book was finished, it felt as if a glimpse of the world of philosophy had appeared for the first time, because the concepts contained in the book had shattered the preconceived notion of philosophy. After finishing the book, he started reading the book from the beginning. For the second time, it seemed as if the book, though dim, had shown itself ready to open. In short, the book was read continuously for five to six months, and each time it was read, the pleasure would be doubled and new doors would begin to open on philosophy.

One day, when I searched for the author's name on Facebook, I was surprised to find that the author is already on my friendlist and despite looking through many of his posts and comments, I could not recognize him. That this is the same person in the shadow of whose authorship my morning and evening and evenings fall in the morning.

After some time, I reached back to the same buxtal and asked the buxtal owner to give me all the books of Mr. Imran Shahid Bhandar in his buxtal. In other words, this time, contrary to his old habit, before buying, he was inclined to take books without turning the pages of a book, which may have been noticed by the owner of the bookstall as he knew me well in this regard. ... This time I found three more books by the author which I picked up and immediately reached home and sat down to read them and in a short time I also read these books many times.

As I mentioned above, after reading these books of the author, the preconceived notion of philosophy and philosophical concepts in his mind completely vanished and when he started looking at philosophy and philosophical concepts from a new angle. So it felt like the time had come to fix the distance of years in months ... 

A clear direction was found and running in that direction and direction was a little easier than before ... And especially the eminent philosophers like Emmanuel Kant, Hegel, Karl Marx, Engels, Lenin, Leuthard, Fuchs, Lucas, Hebermas, and Derrida have had access to them, albeit in a slightly smoother and easier way. ... Because we had spent a lot of time before that, trying to get some access to the basic concepts of these philosophers, but without any clear direction, we would turn around and go back to where we started. Used to be And after reading these important books of the author and understanding them according to our ability, we began to feel clearly that we are now moving forward and that too in a right and clear direction.

However, after that we got ample opportunities to establish strong rituals like friendship with the author which made it easier for us to understand philosophy.

Sometimes I think that on that day the devil had blown in my ear for the first and last time at the right time who persuaded me to pick up the book and take it home ... Otherwise, it is possible that I would still be able to find all the philosophical ideas standing on my head as before, and I would consider them to be standing on my feet in the same condition, and would insist on others to understand and meditate on these basic ideas in the same way.

A story of the Day which is special ( Part - I )

 It was winter ... When I woke up in the morning, my intention was to go out. After breakfast, he left the house and turned towards the bazaar without any intention because after leaving the house, he had not been mentally determined to go to a specific place. When I reached the bazaar, I passed by this special bookstall located in the city, from where I used to buy books for myself since childhood and bring them home. Since I haven't been to this bookstall in the last one year to buy a book, I entered the bookstall without any thought and took a cursory look at the books decorated everywhere. 

Reading the names of the books from the books, he reached the portion where the books of philosophy are arranged in an orderly manner. Since the early days of my youth I was fascinated with philosophy only to the extent of my name, but by then I would have taken home any book of philosophy that I had bought or asked for from a friend, etc. Forced to move away from. The main reason for this was not being able to grasp the philosophical issues properly.

Slipping his eyes from books, he went to a book (Philosophy of postmodernism (critical study) ... author Imran Shahid Bhindar).

Since I had already been reminded in my mind that no Easterner, apart from the West, was capable of writing anything on philosophy, I did not immediately touch the book after seeing the author's Eastern name. Then I don't know if it occurred to me that I reached for this book and picked up the book and saw its first page. Then I hurriedly turned many pages of the book together and looked at a page in the middle of the book. Some of Kant's key ideas were under discussion. The author had a wonderful discussion on some of the points in the canteen philosophy that were already in my mind. After reading two or three pages, I once again jumped from one page to another, and when I reached another page, I was astonished to see that the author had read the most important and profound There has been a discussion of anger over ideas ... 

Then he jumped on the last pages of the book and was overjoyed to learn that the author had made a deliberate attempt to dismantle Sufism and construction in a good way. I did not know how long I would stand and read the book and how much time had elapsed because the contents of the book had enchanted me and made me unaware of my surroundings.

Then Frederick Nietzsche said, "Satan whispered in my ear to take this important book with him."

After paying the price of the book, I immediately went back home ... As soon as he came home, he entered his room and sat back from the first page of the book to read it. I don't remember when I poured a cup of tea into my throat and how many bites I took down my throat. While reading the book, it was three o'clock in the night and I fell asleep with the book on my head with the intention of resting for a while.

Ghazali and Hume: Addiction and Disability Phase -III

 Socrates adds:

What were my hopes and what disappointments did I have to endure? Going forward, I saw that my philosopher, leaving the mind and every principle of order, began to work with the unique concepts of air, water, ether and the like. An example of this is when a person claims that the cause of every action of Socrates is the mind, but when it comes to the detailed explanation of my actions, he says that I am sitting here because my body is made of bones and muscles. The bones and the joints between them are strong, the muscles are flexible. ”(Conversations, 168)

The purpose of all this elaboration was to state that the questions which Ghazali raised and the ideas which he presented as a result of them had been discussed with Ghazali a thousand years ago, and he had also drawn conclusions about them. Aristotle's causal factor, which was dynamic in nature, which was the cause of all change and movement, seems to be the same causal factor in Anexus Ghorath's philosophy, while Socrates raises questions about Anexus Ghorath a thousand years before Ghazali. Yes, they have the same nature as Ghazali. As Socrates sarcastically says that the body is made up of "muscles", but where did the muscles come from? "The joints between the bones are tight."

 In this way, attempts have been made to make room for theological factors in one way or another. And as far as the separation between cause and effect in nature is concerned, on the basis of which Ghazali has tried to make a place for miracles, this concept of separation was present in the philosophy of coincidence and necessity which Ghazali achieved in pursuit of his goals. Uses for Ghazali seems to have known only Aristotle and Plato among the Greek philosophers. This is also the reason why almost all the philosophers before Anexus Goress had a scientific tendency and interpreted the universe on the basis of these factors. 

Since the idea of ​​moving the universe existed in Aristotle's philosophy itself, and from here the possibility could arise for Islamic theologians to harmonize Islamic theology with the concept of nature in Greek philosophy. However, skepticism about the creation of the universe and the concept of cause and effect did not mean much to the Greek materialists. 

The Greek materialists rejected the notion of cause and effect in the creation of the universe, that is, they did not recognize any such necessity in the creation of the universe, and Ghazali raised questions about this necessity in the universe A brief analysis of which has been given above. The "coincidence" on which Ghazali based his miraculous theological thought had already been discussed in Aristotle's "Physics". Ghazali did this by paving the way for theology on the basis of "coincidence" in nature.

to be continued......

Note: This description has to be provided only to dispel the impression that Hume borrowed the philosophy of skepticism from Ghazali. Hume's philosophy is based on "coincidence", which was present in Greek philosophy.