The intellectuals here are also spokespersons

A few years ago, French philosopher Alan Bedouin, speaking on the British channel's program "Hard Talk", was sharply criticizing the policies of the French government. The host said that you are criticizing the policies of the best country like France while your socialism is long gone. The historical words that Bedio said there still resonate in my mind. "I'm a philosopher, not a journalist, and as long as I see new and better possibilities, I'll be very critical," Bedouin said. 

From this conversation I came to the conclusion that a true student of philosophy or philosophy should sharply criticize political and social issues, as long as he has in mind the idea of ​​building a better society. In our country which is trapped in the clutches of the worst political parties, where political parties are transferred by will and one person is made party leader for life, journalists and top intellectuals would be justifying their legitimacy. Are In response to one of my criticisms of the concept of hereditary politics, a superficial "intellectual" said that "democracy in Pakistan has not yet matured." I objected that becoming the spokesperson of these political parties would make democracy more abominable. People should be made aware that if there is dictatorship within political parties then such parties would not be democratic. 

Within France, the chances of improvement were slim, as most of the ideals had been achieved, but a philosopher like Bedouin criticizes it for showing more possibilities. Here in Pakistan, journalism is a buying and selling of conscience, everyone is acting on behalf of their party. But what is the problem with these "intellectuals"? Do they not have a better choice at the intellectual level on the basis of which people can be awakened? Criticize government policies, if they are hostile to the people, set the ideal so that people can realize a better alternative. That's how change happens.

What is the process of making a video?

What's wrong with a married man walking around naked in his room or house, running, or having sex to the best of his ability? What if you were going to the bathroom after having sex and your wife made a video from behind? We don't know anything about the lives of married people, what they do at night, but making videos of everything they do is an ugly moral act that must be condemned. In my opinion, making a video in such a situation should be legally acceptable. Suppose a man makes a video of his wife or girlfriend in such a situation? Now the person we don't like, is the will against him all good? Man has his own rules and regulations. So present proof of mental puberty.