Eid ul Fitr 02 May 202

Its very pleasure and enjoyable day

When Eid came, there was a problem of going home.

Like every time, he thought to go by public transport, but he decided to follow the advice of some friends, took his elder sister with him and dared to drive himself. ۔

 My friendship with this sister is more than all siblings and when friendship is more, you can think of enmity.

 On the way, while refreshing our childhood memories, we came to a point where we both fell silent for a few moments.

 I was driving and my brain started playing.

 Being from a lower middle class family, the first dream of my childhood could have been to have a big house and a big car.

 But it was never thought that the house and the car would be privately owned, and no clear concept of women's ownership could ever be formed in girls like us.

 The only thing that used to happen was that it would be Brother John's car and we would come and say, “Brother John! Where's the car key? Go shopping. "

 And the brother will say go with the driver. Since ATMs or credit cards were not the norm at the time, the idea of ​​handing out cash could only come to mind.

 In other words, the dream of economic development in our country is associated only with the man of the house. Why couldn't we, as girls, think for ourselves?

 Why never thought that I would have a car and my brother would say “Sheila! Where is the key? I have to go to work. "

 I will have a home and I will be able to earn enough to have an army of employees at home who are always at the service of my parents.

 Today, all that we used to think of associating with our brothers, we do not know how and why we got to own the property rights, but in our collective training, there was no concept of autonomy at all.

 Think about whether you are giving confidence to the daughters of your household that the ease of their lives is not only the responsibility of these male relatives.

Labour Day 1st MAY 2022

 ... Labor Day

 The wealth of the upper and middle class is created by squeezing the laborer. The upper and middle class people boast that they have become richer from the poor due to their hard work and intelligence. But they forget that they did not become rich by their own labor but by becoming rich in such a way that they made them work by paying less than other hard working people.

No matter how many rallies politicians want to hold, the color of the election is khaki!no matter how many rallies politicians want to hold, the color of the election is khaki! Joke

 He was recruited as a painter in a Marathi army. When he retired, he started a dyeing shop with the money he got. This is what he had been doing all his life.  Paint the dupatta with fiery pink ”- Now Marathi has dyed khaki uniforms all his life. Even the elders do not know what is the name of fiery punk.  It seems that the girl said, "Uncle Atashi Punk matches with my suit." Marathi said quietly.  They are in color. ”Marathi said,“ Look, son, this is a khaki color, it is very ripe, all the other colors are raw. ”  Nothing comes 😕 I will get it painted somewhere else. ”Marathi snatched the scarf back angrily and said angrily,

 _________

  🙂🤣🤣🤣🤣 So have fun sitting at home with the children and do not spoil the relationship.

Tolerance and Toleration.

For the first time in human history, "tolerance" gained the status of law when it was passed by the "Act of Parliament" in Britain in the sixteenth century.  The impetus was to find a solution to the intolerance that pervaded the various sects of Christianity.

 The situation today is that "tolerance" is taught as a subject in UK schools, colleges and social science courses.  Tolerance, tolerance or tolerance means that we are free to give our opinion, and we should give the same right to our opponents or those who have opposite opinion.  But when it is determined that we are the inheritors of the ultimate truth, not tolerance or intolerance but intolerance and intolerance are born which not only promotes the growth of fascism on the basis of color, race, religion, nationality of the twentieth century.  But the biggest and most important need for minorities is the only obstacle to the establishment of a secular society.  The claim of self-righteousness and the belief that others are false and wrong is rooted in religious fascism, and this is the attitude we see in the political process.  That is, a person may offer whatever opinion he wants, but if another person gives the opposite opinion, then intolerance starts touching the sky.  Intolerance, which fascist ideologues call the basis of fascism, is worst manifested among religious people.  Sometimes fascist behavior is expressed in the name of blasphemy and opponents are massacred, and sometimes criticism of religion leads to intolerance.  To this day, I have not seen any religious person who has not committed a fascist attitude by criticizing religion.

 The United Kingdom saw this intolerance in religion and passed the "Tolerance Law 1689", educating the people on the subject and today the situation is that most religions, nationalities in the world are peaceful while adhering to the principles of tolerance in London.  Living life  However, there are also fascist groups, such as the British National Party and the English Defense League, who have called for a ban on foreigners.  But there are also secular societies that oppose them and publicly call them fascists, standing up for minorities and protecting them.

 The only element at its core, be it political or religious, is intolerance and intolerance. Reducing their severity and gradually burying them in caves centuries ago is essential to the formation of a society where every color,  People of every race, every religion and sect and every nationality can live in peace.  This requires that children be taught "tolerance" as a human value in schools.

The strength of the young arms, the planning of seasoned brains and the right priorities of the state together can take a country to the pinnacle of development.

Power, planning and the right priorities are the basis on which nations develop. If there is a youth force in a state but the seasoned minds of the state do not plan with the right priorities then not only the opportunity is wasted but also the geopolitical shape of the states changes.

Pakistan currently has 60% youth. The majority of them are educated youth. This is a golden opportunity for the state to take advantage of this fortunate era. Ten to fifteen years from today, the age status in the state will be changed to 60% old and 40% young. It will be impossible to make progress in this era. It will be even more difficult to keep the geopolitical situation of the state smooth. If the unrest is not removed today, then tomorrow this unrest will become the weakness of the state which will be difficult to overcome.

Money and land are of great importance in the weakness of youth. You should give the Qur'an to the youth while sitting in the mosque, erect the wall of religion and imprison the youth. The first priority is to meet the physical need, that is, the companionship of men and women, which is very natural, the second is the acquisition of money, which is the second most important need, and the third is the piece of land on which the desire to build a house will remain. If the first two needs are religiously or socially restricted, then the blindness of youth will find any secret or wrong way to fulfill its need. Then whether your dua is Zahra or Mahr-un-Nisa is a Sayyid or the Sunni society will continue to be a model of heinous forms of rebellion. According to Freud, even nature itself is a wall of sand against natural factors.

The majority of today's young generation is with Imran Khan. Imran Khan is a Nargis patient. It has no program. No theory. This is the same box of religious thieves that he sells from time to time and runs his own shop. Even a trillionaire preacher of Punjab keeps putting something in this box of thieves. He has a fan following, especially in KPK and rural areas. Millions of people are affected by the performance of this preacher. The so-called sin of sin makes such actors even more famous because their sermons give the impression that he is just coming up from the court of God and will go back there again. Will pave the way for forgiveness. It doesn't happen. No one can deliver your prayers except you. Those who claim to be peddlers. But youth cannot understand this.

The state will have to take some steps to make the youth a good country to live in. At the top of the list are all the amendments to the constitution that have been on the word since the time of the worst dictator Zia. Religion should be removed from the constitution and it should be based on socialism in the first place, but if this cannot be done at present, then at least a secular constitution is the most important need of the hour. The state cannot develop unless the state leaves the finger of religion. Then incidents like Sialkot will continue to happen and no investor will come to the state. While today's society runs the corporate world and the corporate world does not go to a place where religious narrow-mindedness is found. If religion is to the extent of caste then it is possible to develop like Arabs but if religion starts to be sold in the markets then it becomes a terrible situation.

The state should redesign its role according to the new situation. The unrest in Balochistan has now reached the point where even highly educated women like Shari Baloch are becoming suicide bombers. It is not enough for the state to say that it has an outside hand. Something is wrong. Somewhere the state is making a serious mistake. It is not possible for such an amateur to rise up and commit suicide. Hey, playing on Baba Jan is not a joke. The Baloch youth are not joking at all as you understand. They are fighting for a free country. He is not satisfied with the present role of the state. The state should re-examine the situation of 1971. Take the nation into confidence over your mistakes. The state should recognize that the characters involved in the East Pakistan tragedy were wrong. They are bent on dividing the nation. Give priority to Balochistan on a three-pronged basis today. Look at the problems there first.

Like East Pakistan, the state is doing wrong again today. Presenting a Punjabi as a Pakhtun is a useless and outdated thief who will not sell. Even if it is booked, it will remain ineffective. Force retired jinns to worry about their future so that they can stop selling these thieves. Mianwali's Imran Niazi is KPK's Afridi, neither Yousafzai Pathan nor Murree Baloch nor Mengal. There is real leadership in Baloch. Listen to it. Listen to Mohsin and Manzoor in KPK. Believe it or not. Those who believe should fulfill it unconditionally. Those who believe should leave the stick and celebrate through dialogue. Because this is the twenty-first century and the twenty-first century wants a new terrestrial formation consisting of geographically camouflage. The camouflage system is what is needed today and that is the solution to today's problems. You understand that. If you don't understand, there will be a loss for which the generations will not forgive you.

The bottom line is that questions and objections to God's existence are not the product of a "modern" mind.

The bottom line is that questions and objections to God's existence are not the product of a "modern" mind. These are the ancient questions that were raised at a time when modern science and the modern mind could not even imagine. To say that science has posed a great challenge to religion may be partially correct, but I think that the real rival of religion is religion itself, that is, the thinkers who have raised questions on the fundamental issues of religion are religious. Books were read and picked up, not a science book! In the Islamic tradition, for example, high-minded people like Ibn Sina, Farabi and Ibn Rushd were born who did not accept the basic premise of the Qur'an that God is the Creator of the universe. He said that the universe is ancient. He borrowed this idea from Aristotle, and Aristotle himself derived this idea from the Greek materialist tradition. Similarly, another basic claim of the Qur'an is that after death there is a day of reckoning, there is life, there is punishment and so on. These basic questions are not the result of scientific influence on any modern mind but have been denied by thinkers like Ibn Sina, Farabi, Ibn Rushd and Iqbal in our century. Wahdat-ul-Wujud was not called atheism by any scientist, but it was the claim of the followers of religious books.

The object of science is the universe, and science does not need a god to explain the universe. Therefore, what is important to keep in mind while researching the science of the universe is the doctrinal mind of a scientist, whose weak minds mistakenly understand science. Science is researching the sources of matter. However, as far as metaphysics is concerned, as soon as science has tried to go beyond its scope, it has fallen on deaf ears, and allegations of science fiction have been leveled at it, thus giving it no reasonable answer. Just look at the problem of creation. So far, all scientific endeavors have stalled until the Big Bang. The same point is now being made by Christian theologians that the whole story of the Big Bang is told in the first thirty-one verses of the book of Genesis. My point is that the concept of God and the universe presented in religious books is so contradictory that it has not been accepted by its followers. Therefore, proving the Qur'an by science is a futile act. The cases of the Qur'an are not proved by the Qur'an itself. That is why Mu'tazilah and others called the Qur'an a man-written book. He had not read Richard Dawkins. Now, to raise the question, "Where did the matter come from?" There is not a single point in the whole Qur'an which is not borrowed from the book of Genesis of the Old Testament. And if you look closely, there is no evidence that God Himself has any claim that He created the universe, and that there is no evidence to support His claim. Religion, therefore, creates a heap of assumptions, myths, stories, which even its adherents do not accept. The difference between science, philosophy, and religion, however, is that science provides empirical evidence, philosophy discovers and constructs logical connections, and religion only makes assumptions, and gives no answer. At one point in the Qur'an, Allah says that these people ask you about the soul. Now the principle was that Allah would offer a comprehensible answer to this question. Obviously, God's argument must be more convincing than that of Aristotle and Hegel, but God could not say a word beyond that, "Say that this spirit comes from your Lord." The answers may be persuasive to those who are mentally handicapped, but those who are rational thinkers are not satisfied with it. My objection to this verse is that if Allah knew the answer to this question, that is, He knows what the soul is, then what is the reason for such reluctance to answer? He should have given such an answer that people would have forgotten Aristotle. Can any reader of the Qur'an claim with certainty that God is a soul or an entity? no way. Because there are problems in this book. In the same way, people asked about the Hour, when it will come. In response, the signs of the Hour that he has described are the result of such vague thinking that man is amazed. So if God has given the answer to the question that He created the universe, then He has also given the answer to this question, how? Otherwise, science has no such claim. I do not think that the issue of denial of religion to science should be part of any serious philosophical debate. The effects of science on society, however, are a separate issue from which religion becomes irrelevant in its unnecessary claims.